are less charitable to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are less charitable to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing attitudes or behaviors that show a lack of generosity or kindness towards someone or something. Example: "Critics are less charitable to the film than audiences, highlighting its flaws rather than its strengths."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Other New Jersey Democrats are less charitable to Christie.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The conservative newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung was less charitable to the arriving president and his German fans.

The New York Times

While acknowledging that the Indonesian dictator General Suharto had massacred half a million people, Crozier praised him as "a man of cool nerve, caution, and natural political skill", though he was less charitable to Chiang Kai-shek, whose biography, The Man who Lost China, he published in 1977.

The Telegraph

The MTA and Outfront have come under fire in recent years for allowing ads that promote plastic surgery and for being less charitable to ones that suggest that women have vaginas that do things. .

Huffington Post

Others are less charitable, and less pleased to see him doing so well.

The Guardian

Many Republicans are less charitable, and they express fear that Mr. Bush's political troubles have already spilled over to the party itself, potentially endangering candidates in next year's midterm elections.

The New York Times

State Department officials are less charitable, perhaps because Mr. Rove is considered far more hawkish than Secretary Powell, and far more attuned to domestic politics.

The New York Times

Rocket Internet has had some notable failures in far-flung markets its rush to create startups around tried and tested business ideas — or clones if you are less charitable.

TechCrunch

Others are less charitable.

The New York Times

Others, particularly Connecticut Republicans, are less charitable.

The New York Times

Some London investors are less charitable.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are less charitable to", ensure the context clearly indicates the specific aspect of charity or generosity that is lacking. For example, specify whether it refers to financial support, emotional understanding, or lenient judgment.

Common error

Avoid using "are less charitable to" without providing specific examples or context. Vague statements can weaken your argument and leave the reader unsure of the exact nature of the perceived lack of charity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are less charitable to" functions as a comparative adjective phrase, indicating a reduced level of generosity or leniency towards a specific subject. As Ludwig AI confirms, this expression is grammatically sound and commonly used in English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are less charitable to" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to convey a diminished level of generosity, understanding, or leniency. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. It is most commonly found in news and media contexts, where it serves to express negative comparisons or assessments. When using this phrase, it is best to provide specific examples to clarify the nature of the perceived lack of charity and to avoid overgeneralizations. Alternatives such as ""are more critical of"" or ""are less forgiving of"" can be used to fine-tune the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are more critical of

Focuses on expressing criticism rather than a lack of charity or generosity.

are less forgiving of

Emphasizes a lack of forgiveness for mistakes or shortcomings.

take a dim view of

Highlights a negative or disapproving perspective.

are more harsh on

Stresses severity or strictness in judgment or treatment.

are less lenient with

Implies a lack of mildness or permissiveness in dealing with someone or something.

look unfavorably upon

Highlights disapproval or a negative opinion.

are disinclined to support

Emphasizes a lack of willingness to provide assistance or endorsement.

are not as understanding of

Indicates a lack of empathy or comprehension towards a situation or person.

show less compassion for

Focuses on a lack of sympathy or caring.

are more cynical about

Highlights a distrustful or pessimistic view.

FAQs

How can I use "are less charitable to" in a sentence?

You can use "are less charitable to" to express that someone or something is being treated with less generosity or understanding. For example: "Critics "are less charitable to" the film than audiences."

What is a synonym for "are less charitable to"?

Alternatives to "are less charitable to" include phrases like "are more critical of", "are less forgiving of", or "take a dim view of".

When is it appropriate to use "are less charitable to"?

It is appropriate to use "are less charitable to" when you want to convey a lack of generosity, understanding, or leniency towards a particular subject. This could apply to opinions, judgments, or actions.

What's the difference between "are less charitable to" and "are more critical of"?

"Are less charitable to" implies a lack of generosity or understanding, while ""are more critical of"" focuses specifically on expressing disapproval or finding faults. The former has a broader scope encompassing various forms of generosity, while the latter is more directly about criticism.