are justly equivalent

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are justly equivalent" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the fairness or appropriateness of equivalence between two or more items, concepts, or values. Example: "In this context, the two methods are justly equivalent in terms of their effectiveness and efficiency."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Navajo silversmiths and weavers are justly famous.

The Economist

(They are justly called "the loyal opposition").

The New Yorker

Porridge's opening credits are justly famous.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

The noontime bells are justly famous.

The New York Times - Travel

Facilities for recreation and relaxation in New Orleans are justly famous.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Those headline-grabbing numbers are, justly, cause for concern.

The Guardian

Americans are justly proud of their armed forces.

The New York Times

For that reason, financial firms are justly regulated in ways that other firms are not.

The New York Times - Magazine

Statius' Thebaid and inchoate Achilleid and Valerius' Argonautica are justly less read now than they were.

Encyclopedia Britannica

He was a great conductor, whose interpretations of Bartók — his piano teacher — are justly famed.

The New Yorker

Laura Poitras and Glenn Greenwald are justly feted on the Lincoln Center stage.

Vice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are justly equivalent", ensure you're emphasizing that the equivalence is not just accurate, but also fair or ethically sound. This phrase is most impactful when discussing scenarios where fairness is a key consideration.

Common error

Avoid using "are justly equivalent" when a simple "are equivalent" or "are similar" would suffice. The term "justly" adds a layer of ethical consideration, so it's inappropriate if the context is purely descriptive without implications of fairness or deservedness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are justly equivalent" functions as a predicate adjective, describing a state of equivalence that is considered fair or morally right. It indicates that the items being compared not only possess the same value or effect but that this equality is deserved or appropriate.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are justly equivalent" is grammatically correct but relatively uncommon. Ludwig AI indicates its suitability for contexts where equivalence is not only factual but also carries an ethical or fairness dimension. While the phrase itself is sound, its infrequent usage suggests exercising caution and ensuring its appropriateness within the specific context. Alternatives such as "are fairly equivalent" or "are rightly equivalent" may offer a more accessible expression depending on the nuance you wish to convey. The key is to emphasize both the equivalence and its justifiable nature, particularly in scenarios where fairness is paramount.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are fairly equivalent

Replaces "justly" with "fairly", suggesting a more general sense of equivalence without specific emphasis on justice.

are rightly equivalent

Substitutes "justly" with "rightly", indicating equivalence based on correctness or appropriateness.

are equitably equivalent

Replaces "justly" with "equitably", focusing on the fairness and impartiality of the equivalence.

are justifiably equivalent

Substitutes "justly" with "justifiably", highlighting that the equivalence can be defended or supported with reasons.

are comparably equal

Replaces "justly equivalent" with "comparably equal", emphasizing the degree of similarity rather than the justification of equivalence.

are acceptably equivalent

Focuses on whether the level of equivalence is satisfactory or meets a certain standard.

are reasonably equivalent

Suggests the equivalence is logical and supported by evidence or reasoning.

are substantially similar

Emphasizes the significant degree of likeness between the items being compared, rather than whether the equivalence is 'just'.

are functionally equivalent

Highlights equivalence in terms of function or operation, which might not necessarily imply justice or fairness.

are effectively the same

Indicates the items have nearly identical results or outcomes, diverging from "justly" which focuses on fairness.

FAQs

How can I use "are justly equivalent" in a sentence?

Use "are justly equivalent" to describe two or more things that are not only equal but also fairly or rightly so. For example, "In this context, the two methods "are justly equivalent" in terms of their effectiveness and efficiency."

What can I say instead of "are justly equivalent"?

You can use alternatives like "are fairly equivalent", "are rightly equivalent", or "are equitably equivalent" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use "are justly equivalent"?

It's appropriate when you want to emphasize that the equivalence isn't just accurate but is also fair, ethical, or deserved. It adds a layer of moral or ethical consideration to the comparison.

What's the difference between "are justly equivalent" and "are simply equivalent"?

The phrase "are justly equivalent" implies that the equivalence is not only factual but also fair or morally justifiable. "are simply equivalent" only states that they are equal, without any judgment of fairness or ethical consideration.