are inconsistent with

USAGE SUMMARY

"are inconsistent with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when talking about two things that conflict with each other, are not compatible, or don't mesh together. For example, you could say "His beliefs are inconsistent with the values of our company."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Such claims are inconsistent with reality".

The New Yorker

Our meals are inconsistent, with scrumptious lunches, but bland dinners.

The New York Times - Travel

The Libyan navy's claims are inconsistent with MSF's account.

The Guardian

But all these, too, are inconsistent with the big picture.

The Economist

Her comments are inconsistent with the body of scientific research on the subject.

The Guardian

Persistent disparities in health care are inconsistent with our core values".

The New York Times

"N.Y.M.C. will not sponsor or support an organization whose objectives are inconsistent with our institutional values.

The New York Times

Mr. Brock's mealy-mouthed titles are inconsistent with his pumped-up style.

The New York Times

"They fall far short of our professional standards and some are inconsistent with our policies.

The New York Times

"We don't represent issues that are inconsistent with what we believe in.

The New York Times

"I think these findings are inconsistent with other data that have more rigorous methodology".

The New York Times - Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are inconsistent with", ensure that the subjects being compared are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "are inconsistent with" when the items being compared are not explicitly stated. Be specific about what two things are not aligning to maintain clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are inconsistent with" functions as a predicate adjective phrase, indicating a state of disagreement or incompatibility between two subjects. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

37%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

6%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are inconsistent with" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to denote a lack of agreement, compatibility, or logical coherence between two or more things. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. It's prevalent in formal writing, particularly in science, news, and business contexts. To use it effectively, ensure that the subjects being compared are clearly defined, avoiding ambiguity. Alternatives like "are not in accordance with" or "contradict" can be used to add nuance. Remember to avoid vague subjects to ensure clarity in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are not in accordance with

Replaces "inconsistent" with "not in accordance", emphasizing a lack of agreement or conformity.

are at odds with

Uses the idiom "at odds with" to convey conflict or disagreement.

are in conflict with

Replaces "inconsistent" with "in conflict", highlighting a direct opposition.

contradict

A more concise, verb-based alternative, indicating direct opposition.

do not align with

Emphasizes a lack of alignment or correspondence.

are incompatible with

Focuses on the inability of two things to coexist or function together.

are contrary to

Highlights a direct opposition or contrast.

are irreconcilable with

Stresses the impossibility of bringing two things into agreement.

are divergent from

Emphasizes a departure or deviation from a standard or expectation.

differ from

A simple and direct way to indicate a difference or variation.

FAQs

How can I use "are inconsistent with" in a sentence?

Use "are inconsistent with" to indicate a lack of agreement or compatibility between two or more things. For example, "His actions are inconsistent with his words."

What are some alternatives to "are inconsistent with"?

You can use alternatives such as "are not in accordance with", "are at odds with", or "contradict" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "are inconsistent with" or "are incompatible with"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "are inconsistent with" emphasizes a lack of logical agreement, while "are incompatible with" highlights a functional inability to coexist or work together.

How does "are inconsistent with" differ from "are different from"?

"Are different from" simply states a difference, whereas "are inconsistent with" implies a contradiction or logical incompatibility. For instance, opinions can be different, but actions that violate stated principles are inconsistent with those principles.