are at odds with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are at odds with" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate a disagreement or conflict between two or more parties, ideas, or beliefs. Example: "The findings of the study are at odds with previous research, suggesting a need for further investigation."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

For Harrison, the most satisfying writers are "at odds with their cultural context.

The Guardian

Moreover, they are at odds with themselves.

The Economist

Both of these assertions are at odds with Tibet's history.

The New York Times

Those two things are at odds with each other.

The New Yorker

In India, militant Hindus are at odds with other faiths.

The Economist

And the GDP figures are at odds with other data.

The Economist

Republicans in both houses are at odds with each other.

The Economist

Yet Portuguese voters are at odds with their fellows.

The Economist

Occasionally, they are at odds with United States policy.

The New York Times

Conservative parishes and priests are at odds with their liberal bishops, and vice versa.

The New York Times

MR. SMITHERS offered many views on economics and investing that are at odds with conventional wisdom.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are at odds with" to clearly indicate a conflict or disagreement between two distinct entities or ideas. This phrase is suitable for formal and informal writing.

Common error

Ensure that the subject agrees in number with the verb. For example, instead of "The data is at odds with the hypothesis", use "The data are at odds with the hypothesis" when "data" is treated as plural.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are at odds with" functions as a predicative expression, indicating that two or more entities are in a state of disagreement or conflict. Ludwig AI confirms its usability. For example, "Republicans in both houses are at odds with each other." Ludwig examples shows that it is often found where different sides have different ideas.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Science

26%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are at odds with" is a common and grammatically correct expression used to indicate disagreement, conflict, or inconsistency between two or more entities. It's versatile and appears in various contexts, including news, science, and business. As Ludwig AI suggests, it is commonly used and widely accepted. When using this phrase, ensure subject-verb agreement and consider alternative phrases like "conflict with" or "be in disagreement with" for subtle variations in meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

conflict with

This alternative directly implies a clash or disagreement.

be in opposition to

This suggests a direct and often strong disagreement or resistance.

be in disagreement with

This phrase highlights a difference in opinion or belief.

clash with

This suggests a more forceful and immediate conflict.

contradict

This implies a direct opposition in statements or facts.

be inconsistent with

This suggests a lack of alignment or coherence.

be incompatible with

This highlights an inability to coexist or work together.

be at variance with

This indicates a difference or discrepancy.

stand in contrast to

This emphasizes a noticeable difference when compared.

be antithetical to

This suggests a fundamental and irreconcilable opposition.

FAQs

How can I use "are at odds with" in a sentence?

Use "are at odds with" to show disagreement or conflict. For example, "The new regulations "conflict with" existing practices."

What can I say instead of "are at odds with"?

You can use alternatives like ""conflict with"", "be in opposition to", or "be in disagreement with" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "is at odds with" instead of "are at odds with"?

Use "is at odds with" for singular subjects and "are at odds with" for plural subjects. For example, "His statement is at odds with the facts", but "Their opinions are at odds with each other."

What's the difference between "are at odds with" and "are in agreement with"?

"Are at odds with" indicates disagreement or conflict, while "are in agreement with" indicates consensus or alignment.