Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

are identified to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The expression 'are identified to' is not correct in written English.
To make a sentence using the word 'identify', you can use the following: The plants in this habitat are identified to be endemic species.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Significant prosodic features are identified to differentiate emotions.

The next limiting aberrations are identified to be field-conjugate, FL astigmatism and FC elliptical coma.

Science & Research

Nature

The step fluctuations are identified to be governed by the attachment/detachment limited kinetics.

Furthermore, thereby the outstanding issues are identified to be addressed to benefit and promote practical applications.

BaMnO3 nanoparticles are identified to form at the interface of CeO2 crystallites upon the hydrothermal ageing.

Directions for further research are identified to fully integrate the new constellations into routine GNSS processing.

During maize leaf development, 431 expressed genes are identified to be relevant to hormone synthesis, transduction and responding19.

Science & Research

Nature

Third, renewable energy technologies are identified to reduce coal consumption and to improve energy efficiency.

Finally, possibilities for future developments are identified to enhance the benefit of the analysis.

Finally, important limitations are identified to motivate the future research of 3D printing.

Best practices are identified to allow cities to adopt well-rounded efforts to improve future performance.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for grammatical precision, replace the phrase "are identified to" with more accurate alternatives like "have been identified as" or "are determined to be".

Common error

Avoid using "are identified to" in formal writing. This construction often arises from a misunderstanding of passive voice structures and can be easily corrected by restructuring the sentence.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are identified to" is typically used to describe something that has been recognized or classified. However, it's often grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies a more appropriate construction involves using phrases like "have been identified as".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are identified to" is frequently used, particularly in scientific writing, to indicate that something has been recognized or classified. However, Ludwig AI points out that this phrase is grammatically incorrect. To ensure accuracy and maintain credibility, it's better to use alternatives such as "have been identified as" or "are determined to be". While commonly found in various sources, especially in scientific publications, remember that choosing correct grammar enhances the clarity and professionalism of your writing.

FAQs

How can I correctly use "identified" in a sentence?

Instead of "are identified to", use phrases like "have been identified as" or "are determined to be" to ensure grammatical accuracy.

What are some alternatives to "are identified to" that maintain a similar meaning?

Alternatives include "are known to be", "are found to be", and "are recognized as", depending on the context.

Is "are identified to" grammatically correct?

No, "are identified to" is not grammatically correct. It's better to use alternatives like "have been identified as" or "it is identified that".

What's the difference between "are identified to" and "have been identified as"?

"Are identified to" is grammatically incorrect. "Have been identified as" is the correct passive construction, indicating something has been recognized or discovered to be something else.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: