Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are excluded for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are excluded for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when specifying conditions or reasons for exclusion in a particular context. Example: "Certain participants are excluded for not meeting the eligibility criteria outlined in the guidelines."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(14)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
51 human-written examples
South Africa are excluded for their policy of apartheid, in a games overshadowed by politics.
News & Media
For models that assume gluino pair production, masses up to 1575 and 975 GeV are excluded for gluinos and neutralinos, respectively.
Academia
Energy, saturated fat, total sugar, sodium, fibre, protein, and fruit and vegetable content were all taken into account in the calculator, though some of these are excluded for specific food categories.
News & Media
Local networks of no-take marine reserves have been proven to work around the world, and could include areas where fisheries are excluded for safety reasons around gas infrastructure.
News & Media
There is also a Varietizer, a custom-built vending machine that carries about 23 of the regular Pop-Tart flavors (seasonal offerings, like pumpkin and gingerbread, are excluded for now).
News & Media
"Most of the costs are borne by students who have superior credentials but are excluded for no reason but the color of their skin and by the so-called beneficiaries of the preferences, who experience the demoralization of underperforming, the terrible experience of dropping out at relatively high rates and the reinforcement of negative stereotypes when they and others observe these patterns".
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
9 human-written examples
Even then, two candidates were excluded "for reasons of conduct".
News & Media
Construction contracts have been excluded for this analysis.
News & Media
Sister is excluded for charging pn another's account.
Academia
That doctor is being excluded for three years.
News & Media
"The host organisation was excluded for 12 months.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "are excluded for", ensure that the reason for exclusion is clearly and explicitly stated to avoid ambiguity. For instance, "Participants with pre-existing conditions are excluded for safety reasons."
Common error
Avoid using overly broad or vague reasons for exclusion with "are excluded for". Instead, specify precise and measurable criteria to maintain transparency and avoid subjective interpretations. For example, instead of "are excluded for poor performance", specify "are excluded for failing to meet the minimum performance threshold of X."
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are excluded for" functions as a passive voice construction indicating that certain entities or items are not included or considered due to specific reasons or conditions. Ludwig examples confirm its common use across various domains.
Frequent in
Science
47%
News & Media
27%
Academia
12%
Less common in
Formal & Business
4%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "are excluded for" is a common and grammatically correct construction used to indicate that something is not included due to specific reasons or criteria. Ludwig AI confirms its widespread usage across various contexts, particularly in science, news, and academic writing. When employing this phrase, it's essential to clearly state the exclusion criteria to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "are omitted due to" or "are not included because of" can provide similar meaning with slight variations in emphasis. Remember to avoid vague exclusion criteria and focus on precise, measurable terms.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are omitted due to
This alternative emphasizes the act of leaving something out because of a specific reason.
are not included because of
This alternative is a more explicit and direct way of stating the reason for exclusion.
are ineligible due to
This alternative focuses on the lack of eligibility as the cause for exclusion.
are disqualified because of
This alternative implies a removal from consideration due to a specific failing or reason.
are removed as a result of
This alternative highlights the removal aspect and the consequence of a certain condition.
are precluded by
This alternative suggests that something is prevented or made impossible by a specific factor.
are eliminated because of
This alternative emphasizes the removal or getting rid of something due to a specific reason.
are bypassed due to
This alternative implies that something is skipped or avoided because of a given reason.
are not considered owing to
This alternative is a formal way of saying something is not taken into account because of a reason.
are left out on account of
This alternative is a more descriptive way of saying something is not included for a particular reason.
FAQs
How can I use "are excluded for" in a sentence?
You can use "are excluded for" to indicate the reasons why certain items or individuals do not meet specified criteria. For instance, "Applicants who do not meet the minimum requirements are excluded for consideration".
What can I say instead of "are excluded for"?
You can use alternatives like "are omitted due to", "are not included because of", or "are ineligible due to" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "are excluded for" or "are excluded because of"?
Both "are excluded for" and "are excluded because of" are grammatically correct and can be used interchangeably. The choice often depends on stylistic preference or the specific nuance you wish to convey.
What's the difference between "are excluded for" and "are exempted from"?
"Are excluded for" means to be left out or not included due to certain criteria, while "are exempted from" means to be free from an obligation or requirement. They have opposite meanings; one is a removal and the other is a release.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested