Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

are evidently not

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are evidently not" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is clearly not the case or not true. Example: "The results of the experiment are evidently not what we expected, leading us to question our initial hypothesis."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

34 human-written examples

What's interesting is that fathers are, evidently, not similarly afflicted.

News & Media

The New York Times

Such clubs are evidently not the prime dancers' lifeblood.

News & Media

The New York Times

Birds that live off turds are evidently not a matter of great concern.

News & Media

The Economist

Mr. Levine and Valery Gergiev are evidently not in the mix.

This must start by supporting the millions of people who are evidently not managing.

All these extensions and remote controls are evidently not something a man can handle alone.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

26 human-written examples

He is evidently not alone.

News & Media

The New York Times

He is evidently not intimidated.

News & Media

The New York Times

Something was evidently not right.

(The melancholy is evidently not to be taken too seriously).

It was evidently not enough: Teddy was never seen again.

News & Media

The Economist
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are evidently not" to convey that something is clearly and undeniably not the case, based on available evidence or understanding. It is most effective when the evidence points strongly against a particular conclusion.

Common error

Avoid using "are evidently not" when the negation is already implicitly understood or extremely obvious. This can make your writing sound redundant or condescending. Ensure there's a need to emphasize the lack of evidence before using this phrase.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are evidently not" functions as a declarative statement expressing a negative assertion. It indicates that something is clearly not the case or lacks a certain quality. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

32%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are evidently not" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate that something is clearly not the case. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is correct. It is frequently found in news, media, and scientific contexts, conveying a conclusion based on available information. While similar phrases like "are clearly not" and "are obviously not" can be used as alternatives, "are evidently not" is a reliable way to express a negative assertion with a degree of formality and objectivity. Remember to use this phrase judiciously, avoiding redundancy by only employing it when there's a genuine need to emphasize a lack of evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "are evidently not" in a sentence?

Use "are evidently not" to express that something is clearly not the case, often based on available evidence or observation. For example, "The claims made in the report "are evidently not" supported by the data".

What's a good alternative to "are evidently not"?

Alternatives include "are clearly not", "are obviously not", or "are apparently not" depending on the context and desired emphasis.

Is it better to use "are evidently not" or "are not evidently"?

"Are evidently not" is generally preferred because it maintains a more natural flow and emphasizes the evident nature of the negation. "Are not evidently" is less common and can sound awkward.

What is the difference between "are evidently not" and "are seemingly not"?

"Are evidently not" suggests a stronger sense of clarity and obviousness, while "are seemingly not" implies that something does not appear to be the case based on initial impressions or limited information.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: