are evaluated with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are evaluated with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the methods or criteria used to assess or analyze something. Example: "The results of the experiment are evaluated with a statistical analysis to determine their significance."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Environmental impacts are evaluated with several approaches.

Sustainable Cities and Society

These structures are evaluated with QCADesigner simulator.

Physica B: Condensed Matter

Gambles are evaluated with respect to their expected value.

SEP

Computational loads are evaluated with the Intel dual core system.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

In sum, suppliers are evaluated with 10 criteria.

Journal of Industrial Engineering International

The effects are evaluated with a full factorial experimental plan.

Progress in Organic Coatings

The presented methods are evaluated with extensive experiments.

Journal of Systems Architecture

Performances of the various gravity compensators are evaluated with simulations.

Mechanism and Machine Theory

The proposed algorithms are evaluated with extensive simulations.

Optical Switching and Networking

Their control performances are evaluated with different types of disturbances.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

In addition, the experimental results are evaluated with PrecipiCalc™ simulations.

Acta Materialia

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are evaluated with", ensure that the 'with' phrase specifies a tangible method, criteria, or tool. Be specific to enhance clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid overuse of the passive construction "are evaluated with" if it obscures who is performing the evaluation. Whenever possible, rephrase to use an active voice for a clearer and more direct statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are evaluated with" functions as a passive construction indicating that something is being assessed using a specific method or tool. It emphasizes the means of evaluation rather than the evaluator, which, as Ludwig AI confirms, is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are evaluated with" is a grammatically sound and very common construction used to describe the methods or criteria employed in an assessment process. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for written English, particularly in academic, scientific, and technical domains. It's crucial to ensure clarity by specifying the evaluation method and considering whether an active voice might be more direct. While versatile, be mindful of overusing passive constructions and ensure precision in formal writing to maintain a high standard of communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are assessed by

Focuses on the agent or method doing the evaluating rather than the criteria.

are judged based on

Highlights the criteria used for making a judgement.

are measured using

Emphasizes the tools or metrics involved in the evaluation.

are analyzed via

Stresses the process of detailed examination.

are appraised through

Suggests a formal assessment or estimation.

are scrutinized with

Implies a thorough and critical examination.

are examined in light of

Highlights that something is considered during the evaluation.

are tested against

Focuses on comparing something against a standard or benchmark.

are validated by means of

Indicates that something is confirmed or supported by specific methods.

are checked utilizing

Emphasizes the use of specific resources for verification.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "are evaluated with" to sound more active?

Consider using phrases like "assess using", "judge based on", or "measure with" to make your sentence more direct and active. For instance, instead of "The results "are evaluated with" statistical analysis", try "We assess the results using statistical analysis".

Is it better to say "are evaluated by" or "are evaluated with"?

Use "are evaluated by" when you want to emphasize who or what is doing the evaluation. Use "are evaluated with" when you want to emphasize the tools, methods, or criteria used in the evaluation. Choosing between "are evaluated by" and ""are evaluated with"" depends on whether you want to highlight the evaluator or the evaluation method.

What are some formal alternatives to "are evaluated with"?

In formal writing, you could use "are assessed via", "are appraised through", or "are scrutinized with". These alternatives maintain a professional tone while providing a similar meaning to ""are evaluated with"".

When is it appropriate to use "are evaluated with" in scientific writing?

In scientific writing, ""are evaluated with"" is appropriate when specifying the methods or metrics used to assess results, data, or experimental outcomes. For example, "The data are evaluated with ANOVA to determine statistical significance".