are earmarked for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are earmarked for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that something has been designated or set aside for a specific purpose or recipient. Example: "The funds raised from the charity event are earmarked for local community projects."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Those funds are earmarked for environmental and safety-related projects.

The New York Times

Half of our 600 ambulance stations are earmarked for closure.

The Guardian

In addition, around 100 travel agents are earmarked for closure.

The Guardian - Business

Revenues from the sale are earmarked for conservation programs.

The New York Times

Half the profits are earmarked for the McCosker-Hershfield Cardiac Home.

The New Yorker

Every spot on that list is precious, but certain slots are earmarked for certain purposes.

The New York Times - Magazine

Residents say 20,000 more planned housing units are earmarked for the ultra-Orthodox.

The New York Times

Most, if not all, are earmarked for the maker's electrification efforts.

The Economist

This is a massive misuse of resources that are earmarked for humanitarian and development aid.

The Guardian

Millions of dollars are earmarked for travel and accommodation in the Global Fund grants to Cambodia.

The Guardian

Very often, it's the richer neighbourhoods that are earmarked for green developments, Rogers says.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are earmarked for" to clearly indicate that resources, funds, or items have been specifically designated for a particular purpose. This helps avoid ambiguity and ensures transparency.

Common error

Avoid using "are earmarked for" in overly passive constructions that obscure the actor responsible for the earmarking. Clearly state who designated the resources and for what purpose to maintain clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are earmarked for" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that something has been specifically designated or reserved for a particular purpose. Ludwig provides numerous examples demonstrating its use in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

76%

Formal & Business

12%

Science

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are earmarked for" is a common and grammatically sound way to indicate that something has been specifically designated for a particular purpose. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage, with numerous examples demonstrating its prevalence across various contexts, particularly in news, business, and scientific domains. While alternatives like "are designated for" or "are allocated to" exist, "are earmarked for" carries a strong connotation of commitment and specific intent. When using this phrase, ensure clarity regarding the actor responsible for the earmarking to avoid passive constructions. Overall, this phrase is a reliable and effective way to convey the intended use of resources in both formal and informal communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are designated for

Indicates a formal assignment or appointment, often with official or explicit connotations.

are allocated to

Focuses on the act of distributing or assigning resources to a particular purpose.

are set aside for

Emphasizes the act of reserving something specifically, often for later use or a special purpose.

are reserved for

Highlights that something is being kept for a particular person or purpose and is not generally available.

are intended for

Implies a planned or expected use for something, suggesting a clear purpose.

are assigned to

Suggests a formal task or duty given to someone or something for a particular function.

are devoted to

Emphasizes the dedication of resources or efforts towards a specific cause or purpose.

are committed to

Highlights a firm decision to use something for a particular purpose, implying a strong sense of obligation.

are put towards

Indicates a contribution or application of resources towards a specific goal or project.

are specified for

Stresses that the resources or items are explicitly outlined for a certain use.

FAQs

How can I use "are earmarked for" in a sentence?

You can use "are earmarked for" to indicate that something is specifically designated for a particular purpose. For example, "These funds "are earmarked for" environmental conservation projects".

What can I say instead of "are earmarked for"?

You can use alternatives like "are designated for", "are allocated to", or "are set aside for" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "are earmarked for" or "is earmarked for"?

"Are earmarked for" is used with plural subjects, while "is earmarked for" is used with singular subjects. For example, "The funds are earmarked for education," but "The donation is earmarked for scholarships".

What's the difference between "are earmarked for" and "are intended for"?

"Are earmarked for" suggests a specific and often official designation, while "are intended for" implies a planned or expected use. "Earmarked" carries a stronger sense of commitment.