are divided with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are divided with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when trying to express separation or categorization. Example: "The participants are divided with different teams based on their skills."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

31 human-written examples

The denial is understandable, since both parties are divided, with factions bitterly opposed to any accommodation.

The Economist

The White House staff knows that Americans are divided, with a little over half approving of Bush's performance.

The New Yorker

The central European countries are divided, with Hungary's Viktor Orbán and even some Czech officials playing to Putin's tune.

The Guardian - Opinion

The people are divided, with Mr. Djukanovic's supporters saying they now have just over 50percentt support for independence.

The New York Times

His first three works — "Ghostwritten" (1999), "Number9Dream" (2001), and "Cloud Atlas" (2004) — are divided, with almost fetishistic care, into sections that resemble the movements of a musical composition.

The New Yorker

Mitchell's early works, writes Zalewski, are "divided, with almost fetishistic care, into sections that resemble the movements of a musical composition".

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

27 human-written examples

The capital is sure to be divided, with a Democratic-dominated Legislature probably seeking revenge.

The New York Times

Reviewers of the Hartford production were divided, with an emphasis on the favorable.

The New York Times

The religious establishment is divided, with many senior Shia clerics refraining from congratulating Ahmadinejad.

The Guardian

The reaction on Twitter of attendees was divided, with many still unsure about what to vote.

The Guardian

The establishment is divided, with some stalwarts of the revolution siding with the demonstrators.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity and grammatical correctness, substitute "are divided with" with "are divided into" or "are separated by" to ensure standard English usage.

Common error

Avoid using "are divided with" to express the separation of a group into subgroups based on certain shared characteristics. The correct phrasing is usually "are divided into". For instance, instead of saying 'The students are divided with groups', say 'The students are divided into groups'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are divided with" functions primarily as a passive verb construction, often used to describe how a group or entity is separated. The Examples in Ludwig show this usage across varied contexts, though the phrase can be considered grammatically questionable in standard English as highlighted by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

53%

News & Media

44%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "are divided with" appears in various sources, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI analysis shows it's more prevalent in scientific and technical contexts, but for general usage, alternatives like "are divided into" or "are separated by" are recommended to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness. The phrase's function is primarily to describe separation, but its use can be context-dependent and might be considered awkward in informal settings. Therefore, exercise caution and prefer more standard constructions when possible.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are divided into

Uses a more common and correct preposition to indicate division.

are split into

Implies a separation into distinct groups or categories.

are separated by

Indicates a physical or conceptual boundary between groups.

are partitioned into

Suggests a formal or structured division into segments.

are at odds over

Highlights disagreement or conflict on a particular issue.

are in disagreement about

Focuses on the lack of consensus regarding a specific topic.

are cleaved along

Describes a division along a specific line or plane, often in a technical context.

are bisected by

Indicates division into two equal parts by something.

are fragmented by

Highlights the result of something broken in many pieces, or broken into smaller groups.

are discordant on

Emphasizes lack of harmony or agreement.

FAQs

How to correctly use the phrase "are divided with"?

While the phrase "are divided with" sometimes appears, it's generally better to use alternatives like "are divided into" or "are separated by" for clearer and more grammatically sound sentences.

What is a better alternative to "are divided with"?

More common and grammatically correct alternatives include "are divided into", "are split into", or "are separated by", depending on the intended meaning.

Is it grammatically correct to say "are divided with"?

Standard English grammar typically favors phrases like "are divided into" or "are separated by" over "are divided with". While the latter may appear in some contexts, it is less conventional.

What's the difference between "are divided with" and "are divided into"?

"are divided into" is a standard and widely accepted construction for indicating a separation into distinct groups or categories. "Are divided with" is less common and may sound awkward or incorrect to many English speakers.