Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are counted for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are counted for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing how certain items, actions, or factors are considered or included in a total or calculation. Example: "In the final tally, all votes cast by mail are counted for the overall results."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
30 human-written examples
The Dell board changed a similar rule last week to say that only shareholders who actually vote at the meeting are counted for purposes of the condition.
News & Media
An important caveat here, though, is that only companies that are declaring revenues are counted for this comparison, which may count out a number of those new technology startups who have yet to bring in any income.
News & Media
Counting absentee ballots in Florida can take time because ballots from overseas or from members of the military are counted for several days after Election Day, though they must be postmarked by Nov. 6.
News & Media
"In this sweet Elysium, the years are counted for two decades and when 20 is reached, one automatically drifts into an indefinite period known as 'the twenties', where One stays, unless possessed of tremendous courage, for 30 or 40 years, or until further face-lifting becomes impractical".
News & Media
However, the schools may be benefiting from the reduction if the pupils leaving their books are lower-achievers, as only those on their rolls in the January of the year before pupils are due to complete GCSE courses are counted for league-table purposes.
News & Media
Earthquakes are counted for the same station under a constant criterion using S-P time and maximum amplitude in seismograms.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
30 human-written examples
Fifty hinges were counted for each genotype.
Science
Twenty wing discs were counted for each genotype.
Science
Forty-eight chromosomes (2n = 48) were counted for var.
Science
At least 100 cells were counted for each sample.
Science
The total number of roots was counted for each plant.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "are counted for" when you want to emphasize that specific items or factors are included in a final calculation or assessment. Ensure the subject clearly indicates what is being counted.
Common error
Avoid assuming that everything is automatically "counted for". Be explicit about what is included and what is excluded to prevent misinterpretations.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are counted for" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject is being acted upon. Ludwig AI confirms the grammatical correctness of this phrase.
Frequent in
Science
48%
News & Media
32%
Wiki
8%
Less common in
Formal & Business
8%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "are counted for" is a grammatically correct passive verb phrase used to indicate that certain items or factors are included in a calculation or evaluation. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a common phrase found in various contexts, including science, news media, and general writing. While maintaining a generally neutral tone, it's crucial to be explicit about what is included to prevent misinterpretations. Remember that the best alternatives are "are included in" and "are taken into account", so you can select the most relevant alternative.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are tallied for
Directly relates to the process of counting and summing.
are included in
Focuses on the inclusion aspect rather than the act of counting.
are added to
Highlights the act of summing things together
are taken into account
Emphasizes consideration and acknowledgement.
are considered in
Highlights the act of considering something when making a judgment.
are factored into
Suggests a more mathematical or calculated inclusion.
are enumerated for
Formal and emphasizes a detailed listing or counting.
are reckoned with
Implies that something must be dealt with or faced.
are assessed for
Emphasizes the evaluation and judgment aspect.
contribute to
Focuses on the aspect of how individual parts add to a whole
FAQs
How do I use "are counted for" in a sentence?
Use "are counted for" to show that certain items, actions, or factors are included in a total or calculation. For example, "Only the votes cast before midnight "are counted for" the final results".
What can I say instead of "are counted for"?
You can use alternatives like "are included in", "are taken into account", or "are considered in" depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "is counted for" instead of "are counted for"?
No, "is counted for" is used with singular subjects, while "are counted for" is used with plural subjects. For example, "Each vote "is counted for" the final tally," but "All votes "are counted for" the final tally".
What's the difference between "are counted for" and "accounted for"?
"Are counted for" emphasizes the act of including items in a calculation, while "accounted for" suggests that something has been explained or its whereabouts are known. For example, the missing funds were accounted for after the audit.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested