Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are corrupted with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are corrupted with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that has been tainted or negatively influenced by a particular factor or element. Example: "The data in the system are corrupted with errors that need to be fixed before analysis can proceed."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
19 human-written examples
Frames are corrupted with VAR = 0.01.
The signals are corrupted with heavy-tailed noise.
To simulate the behavior of a real reactor, the output responses are corrupted with random noise.
Science
The test sequences are corrupted with packet loss rates of 3%, 5 %, 10, and 20%.
In this work we present an analysis of the so-called Signal Space CoSaMP method when the measurements are corrupted with mean-zero white Gaussian noise.
In this paper a new multiregion thresholding methodology is presented to overcome the common drawbacks of thresholding methods when images are corrupted with artifacts and noise.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
41 human-written examples
Elisabeth Krents, director of admissions for the Dalton School, said that Dalton had "significant concerns about how the test has been corrupted with the widespread prepping and the availability of testing materials online".
News & Media
In addition, the received signal will be corrupted with white Gaussian noise w(t).
The signal received by each user is corrupted with AWGN noise and intercell interference.
For the experiments, the speech utterances were corrupted with the real and generated noise samples.
The noise image is corrupted with Gaussian noise with variance of 0.08 as shown in Figure 12(a).
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "are corrupted with", ensure the subject clearly identifies what is being tainted and the object specifies the source of the corruption. This clarity strengthens the sentence's impact and precision.
Common error
While grammatically correct, "are corrupted with" carries a formal tone. Avoid using it in casual conversation or informal writing, opting instead for more relaxed alternatives like "are messed up by" or "are spoiled by".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are corrupted with" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject has been negatively affected or tainted by something. Ludwig examples show its use across different domains to describe data, images, or even ideals that have been damaged or compromised.
Frequent in
Science
80%
News & Media
15%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "are corrupted with" is a versatile phrase primarily used to denote a state of degradation or compromise due to external factors. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically sound and widely accepted. It finds its strongest presence in scientific and news-related contexts, where conveying the idea of something being tainted or damaged is crucial. While generally correct, be mindful of the slightly formal tone and consider alternatives like "are tainted by" for more informal settings. Remember to use the correct verb conjugation based on the subject, ensuring accuracy and clarity in your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are tainted by
Focuses on a loss of purity or integrity due to external influence.
are contaminated by
Implies the presence of unwanted or harmful substances.
are polluted with
Suggests the introduction of harmful elements causing degradation.
are compromised by
Highlights a weakening or impairment of function or integrity.
are defiled by
Emphasizes the violation of something sacred or pure.
are adulterated with
Indicates the addition of inferior or spurious substances.
are marred by
Focuses on the damage or disfigurement caused by something.
are afflicted by
Emphasizes the suffering or distress caused by something.
are riddled with
Indicates the presence of something undesirable throughout.
are plagued by
Highlights a persistent and troublesome problem.
FAQs
How can I use "are corrupted with" in a sentence?
The phrase "are corrupted with" is used to indicate that something has been negatively affected or tainted by something else. For example, "The data "are corrupted with" errors" or "His ideals "are corrupted with" greed".
What are some alternatives to "are corrupted with"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "are tainted by", "are contaminated by", or "are compromised by".
Is it correct to say "is corrupted with" instead of "are corrupted with"?
The verb form depends on the subject. Use "is corrupted with" for singular subjects (e.g., "The file is corrupted with a virus") and "are corrupted with" for plural subjects (e.g., "The images are corrupted with noise").
What is the difference between "are corrupted with" and "are affected by"?
"Are affected by" is a more general term indicating influence, while "are corrupted with" implies a negative impact that compromises integrity or purity. The phrase ""are corrupted with"" suggests a more severe and detrimental alteration.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested