are considered with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are considered with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when trying to express that something is taken into account or regarded alongside something else. Example: "The factors that are considered with the decision include cost, time, and resources."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But, as always with Shriver, the possibilities are considered with a moral seriousness worthy of George Eliot.

The Guardian - Books

New Zealand, Germany, Switzerland, the EU and Canada also have greater planned cuts than Australia when their commitments are considered with a 2005 starting point.

The Guardian

Two reverberant environments are considered with different extent of reverberations.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Five flows are considered with its designated data rates.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

These features are considered with a simple box-plate model.

Advances in Space Research

Three different stratification levels are considered with different turbulence conditions.

Combustion and Flame

In the former, only path loss attenuation effects are considered, with path loss exponent α>2.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Different resources are not weighted, i.e., all materials are considered with 1 kg/kg.

Energy, Sustainability and Society

These powers of two are implemented using hardwired shifts and therefore are considered with no cost.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

However, equations of this type are considered with the condition defined at the origin.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

For the simulation, QPSK/OFDM symbols are considered with N = 16.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When you mean that items are taken into account or assessed alongside other factors, use more precise phrases like "are taken into account with", "are regarded alongside", or "are evaluated along with" to enhance clarity.

Common error

Don't use the phrase "are considered with" when attempting to express that something is taken into account or regarded alongside something else. This phrasing is grammatically incorrect and can confuse your readers. Choose alternatives such as "are taken into account with" or "are regarded alongside" for accurate communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are considered with" attempts to express that certain elements are taken into account alongside others. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. It's often intended to mean items are evaluated or assessed together, but the phrasing is non-standard.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

88%

News & Media

8%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "are considered with" appears frequently across various sources, Ludwig AI flags it as grammatically incorrect. It's often used to suggest that items are evaluated alongside other factors, but more precise and grammatically sound alternatives like "are taken into account with" or "are evaluated along with" are recommended. The high frequency of the phrase doesn't validate its use; rather, it highlights a common error to avoid, especially in formal writing. Opting for clearer alternatives ensures effective communication and avoids potential confusion.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are taken into account with

Emphasizes the inclusion of something as a factor in a decision or assessment; replaces "considered" with a more explicit phrase.

are regarded alongside

Highlights viewing items in parallel or together during evaluation; substitutes "considered" with a term implying simultaneous assessment.

are factored in with

Focuses on incorporating elements into a calculation or process; replaces "considered" with a term suggesting integration.

are evaluated along with

Stresses comprehensive evaluation in conjunction with something else; uses "evaluated" instead of "considered" to convey a more thorough process.

are assessed together with

Similar to 'evaluated along with' but puts more emphasis on the assessment aspect.

are contemplated in conjunction with

Emphasizes thorough deliberation alongside something else.

are viewed in relation to

Highlights how something is perceived relative to something else, changing the focus from direct consideration to relational viewing.

are weighed against

Highlights a process of comparative importance or relevance.

are integrated with

Focuses on the combination of elements.

are examined in light of

Indicates that the examination is informed by something else.

FAQs

How can I use "are considered with" correctly?

The phrase "are considered with" is generally not considered grammatically correct. It is better to use phrases like "are taken into account with" or "are regarded alongside" for clarity and accuracy.

What are some alternatives to "are considered with"?

Alternatives include "are evaluated with", "are assessed with", or "are factored in with", depending on the specific context you intend to convey.

Is "are considered with" formal or informal?

Given that Ludwig AI considers the phrase grammatically incorrect, it is best to avoid it in both formal and informal writing. Use more standard phrases to maintain clarity and grammatical correctness.

What's the difference between "are considered with" and "are considered in light of"?

"Are considered with" is generally incorrect. "Are considered in light of" is a valid phrase used to indicate that something is being evaluated taking certain factors into account. A better alternative to "are considered with" would be "are evaluated in light of".