are comparable with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are comparable with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing similarities or equivalences between two or more items, concepts, or entities. Example: "The two theories are comparable with each other in terms of their fundamental principles."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I'm not saying all face-to-face fundraising experiences are comparable with mine.

The Guardian

Because of the shortage, prices are comparable with those in Vienna and Berlin.

The New York Times

They were calculated from the latest census and are comparable with figures a decade earlier.

The Guardian

In Norwich, for example, private-sector pay rates are comparable with those in Newcastle.

The Economist

Imaging characteristics are comparable with acute osteomyelitis.

Insights into Imaging

These results are comparable with ours.

International Journal of Implant Dentistry

They are comparable with commercial ITO films.

Applied Surface Science

These results are comparable with those reported in the literature.

Journal of Economic Structures

These values are comparable with European papers of similar age.

Heritage Science

Our results are comparable with recently published studies [12, 14].

EJNMMI Research

The obtained results are comparable with the previous results.

Nanoscale Research Letters

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are comparable with", ensure that the items being compared share a common basis for comparison to avoid illogical or misleading statements.

Common error

Avoid comparing items that lack a logical connection. For instance, stating "the speed of a car is comparable with the taste of an apple" is nonsensical, as these have no relatable qualities to compare.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are comparable with" functions as a linking phrase that serves to draw an analogy between two or more entities. Ludwig AI confirms its usability, showing several examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

78%

News & Media

13%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are comparable with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression employed to highlight similarities between different subjects. Ludwig AI validates its correctness and broad applicability. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, this phrase serves the purpose of establishing a relationship of likeness, facilitating understanding and analysis. When utilizing this phrase, ensure a logical basis for comparison exists to avoid misleading implications. Alternative phrases, such as "are similar to" or "are equivalent to", can be considered based on the nuances of the intended message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are similar to

Focuses on the likeness between two or more things, omitting the direct comparison aspect.

are analogous to

Emphasizes a resemblance in some particular aspects or details.

are equivalent to

Stresses the equality in value, measure, or effect.

are on par with

Highlights the equivalence in quality, status, or performance.

are commensurate with

Implies a proportional or corresponding relationship.

bear comparison to

Suggests that a comparison is appropriate and meaningful.

are in line with

Indicates agreement or conformity with a standard or expectation.

correspond to

Highlights a direct relationship or match between items.

equate to

Highlights a similarity that renders them equal.

approximate to

Highlights the similarity between two items that is close to each other.

FAQs

How can I use "are comparable with" in a sentence?

Use "are comparable with" to show similarities between two or more things. For example, "The prices here "are comparable with" those in other major cities".

What's a formal alternative to "are comparable with"?

In formal writing, consider using "are equivalent to" or "are analogous to" for a more sophisticated tone.

How does "are comparable with" differ from "are similar to"?

"Are comparable with" implies a direct comparison, while "are similar to" simply indicates a likeness without necessarily suggesting a detailed comparison.

Is it always necessary to state what the items "are comparable with"?

Yes, for clarity, it's crucial to specify what the subjects "are comparable with" to avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of saying "These results are comparable", specify "These results are comparable with previous studies".