Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are checked for errors
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are checked for errors" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a process where something is reviewed or examined for mistakes or inaccuracies. Example: "Before submission, all documents are checked for errors to ensure accuracy."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
During real-time ground contacts with the APL ground station, downlinked files are checked for errors.
Science
All data are checked for errors using an inbuilt automated validation system.
Science
All completed patient questionnaires are checked for errors and missing data by a SRA as they are returned.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
The computational basis was checked for errors when used for solving a quantum algorithm.
The College Board disclosed a new problem yesterday in its efforts to assess and correct mistakes in the scoring of its October SAT test: an overlooked batch of 1,600 exams that have not been checked for errors.
News & Media
Debugging the neural networks in self-driving cars is an especially slow and tedious process, with no way of measuring how thoroughly logic within the network has been checked for errors.
Academia
Some deductions, however, are so long or complex that they cannot be checked for errors by human beings.
Academia
A total of 1826 trees was checked for errors following the methods of Hurst et al. ([2007]).
Data from the surveys were entered into statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS), and 70 randomly selected surveys were checked for errors.
This is in contrast to error correction in DNA replication where only the genotype is checked for errors.
Science
All the quantitative data from the surrogate client survey and retail audit were checked for errors and coded each day.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "are checked for errors", specify the method or criteria used for checking to provide clarity and context.
Common error
Avoid using "are checked for errors" without clarifying what constitutes an error in the given context. Be specific about the criteria used for the check.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are checked for errors" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject undergoes a process of verification. It highlights the action performed on the subject to ensure accuracy, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "are checked for errors" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate a process of verification and quality control. Ludwig AI highlights its prevalence in scientific contexts, emphasizing its role in ensuring accuracy. While the phrase is generally suitable for various registers, specifying the checking criteria enhances clarity. Alternatives such as "are verified for accuracy" or "are validated for mistakes" can be used for variety. Overall, "are checked for errors" is a valuable tool for conveying assurance and reliability in writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are verified for accuracy
Focuses on confirming the correctness and precision of something.
are validated for mistakes
Emphasizes the process of ensuring something is free from mistakes.
are inspected for inaccuracies
Highlights the act of closely examining something for errors.
are scrutinized for faults
Implies a thorough and critical examination to find errors.
are reviewed for defects
Focuses on assessing something to identify any defects or shortcomings.
are examined for omissions
Highlights that the process is centered in finding any omissions.
are assessed for flaws
Focuses in evaluating any flaws.
undergo error checking
Describes the process of checking for errors using a different verb.
have errors verified
Uses a passive construction to emphasize the verification of errors.
go through error correction
Indicates a process where errors are identified and corrected.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "are checked for errors"?
You can use alternatives like "are verified for accuracy", "are validated for mistakes", or "are inspected for inaccuracies" depending on the specific context.
What does it mean when items "are checked for errors"?
It means that the items undergo a review process to identify and correct any mistakes, inaccuracies, or inconsistencies. This process ensures the quality and reliability of the items.
Is it redundant to say "are checked for errors and mistakes"?
Yes, it can be redundant since "errors" and "mistakes" are very similar in meaning. It's better to simply say "are checked for errors" or "are checked for mistakes" to avoid unnecessary repetition.
In what contexts is "are checked for errors" commonly used?
As Ludwig AI indicates, it's frequently used in scientific and technical contexts, as well as in general writing where accuracy and precision are important. Examples include checking data, documents, or code.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested