Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are characterised in
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are characterised in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the features or qualities of something in a specific context or framework. Example: "The species are characterised in their ability to adapt to extreme environments."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
34 human-written examples
Hypopomids are characterised in part by their tiny eyes and lack of teeth.
News & Media
Experimental parameters like topography, current densities, field strengths and hydrodynamics are characterised in double logarithmic plots.
Science
The defects are characterised in terms of energy levels, effectiveness, and concentration.
The structure and properties of this intermediate are characterised in this study.
Science
The materials are characterised in order to provide suitable input parameters.
Science
The oxide layers are characterised in terms of thickness, surface area, crystalline phase, adherence on the support surface, etc.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
26 human-written examples
This is characterised in terms of Ra and Da.
Science
It is unclear whether the prime minister's arrangement with the email server could be characterised in this way.
News & Media
The signal-transduction network responsible for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli has been characterised in extraordinary detail.
The growth properties of the virus were characterised in cell culture and in an animal model.
The different sources of biomass were characterised in terms of productivity and radiocaesium content.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Prefer active voice construction for a more concise and direct writing style unless the passive voice is required for emphasis or objectivity.
Common error
Avoid using "are characterised in" without clearly specifying what aspects are being characterized. Vague characterizations can lead to ambiguity. Instead of writing "The data are characterised in the report", specify what aspects are characterized: "The data's trends and anomalies are characterised in the report".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are characterised in" functions as a passive voice construction, used to describe how certain attributes or qualities are attributed to a subject within a specific context. Ludwig examples confirm its usage in scientific and journalistic writing.
Frequent in
Science
76%
News & Media
16%
Wiki
8%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "are characterised in" is a grammatically correct passive construction used to describe the attributes or features of something within a specific context. Ludwig's analysis of numerous examples reveals that it is most commonly found in scientific and news-related sources. While grammatically sound, it's important to ensure clarity and specificity in its usage, avoiding vague characterizations. As Ludwig AI indicates, alternative phrasing, such as "are defined by" or "are described in", may sometimes offer a more concise or nuanced expression, depending on the intended meaning and context. Ensure the context specifies what aspects are being characterized and in what terms to enhance clarity.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are defined by
Focuses on essential qualities that determine the nature of something.
are distinguished by
Highlights unique features that set something apart from others.
are identified through
Emphasizes the method or criteria used to recognize something.
are known for
Indicates widely recognized or prominent qualities.
are marked by
Suggests specific features are typical or noticeable.
are featured in
Implies something is highlighted or prominently displayed within a particular context.
are exemplified by
Indicates something serves as a typical example or representation.
are reflected in
Suggests something is mirrored or manifested within a certain context.
are represented through
Emphasizes the method or means by which something is portrayed or shown.
are specified by
Highlights qualities defined by an explicit set of standards.
FAQs
How can I use "are characterised in" in a sentence?
You can use "are characterised in" to describe the qualities or features of something within a specific context. For example: "The rock samples "are characterised in" terms of their mineral composition".
What are some alternatives to "are characterised in"?
Some alternatives include "are defined by", "are described in", or "are known for", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "are characterised in"?
While "are characterised in" is grammatically correct, using the active voice often leads to clearer and more concise writing. For example, instead of "The results "are characterised in" the study", you could say "The study characterises the results".
What's the difference between "are characterised in" and "are described in"?
"Are characterised in" implies a deeper analysis and identification of key features, while "are described in" simply means giving an account of something. Characterization involves more interpretation and synthesis.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested