are challenged for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are challenged for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing situations where individuals or groups are confronted or questioned about something, often in a competitive or evaluative context. Example: "The candidates are challenged for their qualifications during the interview process."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

After you enter your CalNet passphrase, you are challenged for what we call a "second factor" of authentication.

University of California, Berkeley

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

All the parts are challenging for director and actors.

The Guardian

Seven points more and we are challenging for something.

The Guardian - Sport

Such observations are challenging for trial design, he says.

Nature

Managing multiple networks are challenging for SMEs.

Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research

He would almost certainly be challenged for the party leadership.

BBC

They're going to be challenged for the wrong reason".

Huffington Post

Watch how each 50/50 ball is challenged for.

WikiHow

This could be challenging for the audience.

The New York Times - Books

He was challenging for a medal.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

And it was challenging for two reasons.

University of California, Berkeley

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are challenged for" when you want to convey a sense of formal questioning or confrontation, particularly regarding someone's qualifications, actions, or beliefs.

Common error

Avoid using "are challenged for" in casual conversations or informal writing. Opt for simpler alternatives like "questioned about" or "asked about" to maintain a natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are challenged for" primarily functions as a passive construction indicating that someone or something is being questioned or confronted about a specific attribute, action, or belief. This is evident in the Ludwig examples where individuals are challenged regarding their qualifications or actions.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Academia

33%

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are challenged for" is a grammatically sound but relatively infrequent construction used to indicate that someone or something is being questioned or confronted about a specific attribute, action, or belief. As determined by Ludwig, its primary function is to express scrutiny or the act of questioning, and it is best suited for neutral to professional registers. While "are challenged for" is deemed correct, remember to consider the context of use, opting for simpler alternatives in casual settings. Understanding its function and register can significantly improve the clarity and appropriateness of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are questioned about

Replaces "challenged" with a more direct synonym, focusing on the act of interrogation.

are held accountable for

Shifts the focus to responsibility and being answerable for actions or outcomes.

are confronted about

Highlights a direct and potentially adversarial encounter.

are called into question regarding

Introduces a more formal and investigative tone, highlighting doubts or uncertainties.

are taken to account for

Focuses on responsibility and justification.

are taken to task for

Implies criticism or reprimand for a specific action or failure.

are investigated for

Suggests a formal inquiry to determine facts or culpability.

are scrutinized for

Emphasizes thorough and critical examination, often with the intent of finding flaws.

are blamed for

Indicates the attribution of fault or responsibility for something negative.

face challenges regarding

Focuses on the difficulties and obstacles one encounters.

FAQs

How can I use "are challenged for" in a sentence?

Use "are challenged for" to indicate that someone is being questioned or confronted, especially regarding their qualifications, actions, or beliefs. For example, "The candidates "are challenged for" their experience during the interview."

What's a simpler way to say "are challenged for"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "are questioned about", "are held accountable for", or "are scrutinized for".

Is "are challenged for" appropriate for all types of writing?

While grammatically correct, "are challenged for" is best suited for formal or semi-formal writing. In more casual settings, simpler alternatives may be more appropriate.

What is the difference between "are challenged for" and "are blamed for"?

"Are challenged for" implies a questioning or confrontation, while "are blamed for" suggests that someone is being held responsible or at fault for something negative.