Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are categorized to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "are categorized to" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct preposition should be "as" or "into" depending on the context. Example: "The animals are categorized as mammals based on their characteristics."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
14 human-written examples
These cellular receptors are categorized to several families of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs).
Science
It offers up a wide variety of media assets, all of which are categorized to make them easy to search and discover based on hashtag.
News & Media
All the questions which needed reiteration of the content that has been explicitly been taught in the seed or in any other previous lecture in the course are categorized to follow clarification strategy.
Such methods may fail to identify "weak" occurrences of the motif and often do not take into account the actual number of occurrences of the motif (for instance, in PRIMA, promoters are categorized to those having 0, 1, 2, or more than 2 occurrences of the motif).
Science
† Several putative enhancer located 50 kb downstream of Klf4 are categorized to another non protein-coding transcript.
Science
Furthermore, even if tumors are categorized to a similar phenotype based on one characteristic, they can display discordances regarding other cellular mechanisms.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
45 human-written examples
The study materials can be categorized to three types.
The developed ANN models were categorized to type I and type II ANN models.
Science
The different operating and system parameters have been categorized to understand their performance behavior.
LOR can be categorized to the idea of multi-targets based QSAR modeling for VS.
Science
Machine learning approaches can be categorized to supervised and unsupervised approaches [31].
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When categorizing items, always use the correct preposition. Instead of saying "are categorized to", use "are categorized as" or "are categorized into".
Common error
A common mistake is using the wrong preposition after "categorized". Ensure you use "as" when specifying the category type (e.g., "are categorized as mammals") or "into" when indicating groups (e.g., "are categorized into subgroups").
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are categorized to" functions as a passive verb construction aiming to indicate classification. However, it is grammatically incorrect due to the inappropriate use of the preposition "to". Ludwig's AI indicates that the correct preposition should be "as" or "into".
Frequent in
Science
71%
News & Media
21%
Wiki
7%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "are categorized to" appears in various sources, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI highlights that the correct usage involves using "as" (e.g., "are categorized as mammals") or "into" (e.g., "are categorized into groups"). The intent behind the phrase is typically to describe classification or grouping, but the incorrect preposition undermines its effectiveness. Therefore, always use the correct preposition to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy in your writing. Opt for alternatives like "are classified as" or "are grouped into" to maintain precision and correctness.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are classified as
Emphasizes the formal act of assigning something to a specific class.
are grouped into
Suggests a collection is organized into distinct sets.
are divided into
Highlights the separation of a whole into parts.
are sorted by
Focuses on arranging items according to a specific criterion.
are arranged by
Similar to 'sorted by' but can also imply physical placement.
are organized under
Indicates a hierarchical structure or framework.
are indexed by
Suggests a systematic listing for easy retrieval.
are cataloged under
Implies a detailed listing and description of items.
are sectioned into
Focuses on dividing something into distinct sections or parts.
are compartmentalized into
Emphasizes separation into distinct, often isolated, units.
FAQs
What's the proper way to use "categorize" in a sentence?
Use "categorize as" when specifying a category (e.g., "The books are categorized as fiction") or "categorize into" when dividing into groups (e.g., "The data are categorized into three groups").
What can I say instead of "are categorized to"?
You can use alternatives like "are classified as", "are grouped into", or "are divided into" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "are categorized to" or "are categorized as"?
"Are categorized as" is the correct form. "Are categorized to" is grammatically incorrect. Use "are classified as" as an alternative.
How do I choose between "are categorized as" and "are categorized into"?
Use "are categorized as" when you're stating what something is (e.g., "are categorized as animals"). Use "are categorized into" when you're describing how things are divided (e.g., "are categorized into types").
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested