Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
are grouped into
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The part of the sentence "are grouped into" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is commonly used to express the idea of something being divided into different categories or classes. For example, "The students are grouped into three different teams."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(20)
are classified into
are categorized into
are divided into
are organised into
are separated into
are sorted into
are assembled into
are consolidated into
are allocated to
are apportioned into
are organized into
are categorised into
are incorporated into
are comprised into
are disaggregated into
are characterised into
are clustered into
are differentiated into
are transformed into
are transposed into
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The clubs are grouped into national cartels.
News & Media
Like Hogwarts, students are grouped into Houses.
News & Media
Stations are grouped into eleven regions.
Academia
These categories are grouped into eight dimensions.
Scores on the statewide tests are grouped into four levels.
News & Media
In Fluevog land, shoe styles are grouped into Families.
News & Media
Antibodies are grouped into five classes and several subclasses.
Science & Research
These are grouped into subdistrict, district, and state organizations.
Encyclopedias
Services are grouped into "full" and "base" packages.
Academia
BIN_WIDTH: Data are grouped into bins of the specified width.
Academia
The essays are grouped into a trio of themes.
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "are grouped into", ensure the criteria for grouping are clear to the reader. Providing context for the grouping helps avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "are grouped into" without clearly defining the categories. For instance, instead of saying "The data are grouped into types", specify "The data are grouped into three types: A, B, and C."
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "are grouped into" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject is being organized or categorized. As Ludwig AI suggests, this construction is widely recognized and grammatically sound.
Frequent in
Science
40%
News & Media
20%
Academia
18%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
8%
Wiki
7%
Formal & Business
7%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "are grouped into" is a grammatically sound and widely used construction for indicating that items or entities are organized into distinct categories. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for both formal and informal contexts, with a prevalent use in scientific and academic writing. When using this phrase, clarity is key: ensure the grouping criteria are well-defined to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives like "are classified into" or "are divided into" to achieve subtle differences in meaning.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
are organised into
Changes the spelling from 'grouped' to 'organised', slightly altering the tone to British English.
are classified into
Replaces "grouped" with "classified", implying a more structured or scientific categorization.
are categorized into
Substitutes "grouped" with "categorized", suggesting a systematic organization based on specific criteria.
are divided into
Uses "divided" instead of "grouped", emphasizing the separation into distinct parts.
are separated into
Replaces "grouped" with "separated", highlighting the distinction between different groups.
are arranged into
Changes "grouped" to "arranged", suggesting a deliberate order or placement within the groups.
are sorted into
Replaces "grouped" with "sorted", indicating organization based on specific properties or characteristics.
are assembled into
Changes "grouped" to "assembled", implying that things are brought together into a structured unit or set of units.
are consolidated into
Replaces "grouped" with "consolidated", suggesting a merging or combining into a smaller number of groups.
are allocated to
Uses "allocated" instead of "grouped", implying an assignment to specific categories based on defined criteria.
FAQs
How can I use "are grouped into" in a sentence?
The phrase "are grouped into" is used to describe how items or entities are organized into distinct categories or sets. For example, "The students are grouped into teams based on their skill levels."
What are some alternatives to "are grouped into"?
Some alternatives include "are classified into", "are categorized into", or "are divided into". The best choice depends on the specific context and the desired nuance.
Is it better to use "are grouped by" or "are grouped into"?
"Are grouped by" indicates the characteristic used for grouping, while "are grouped into" specifies the resulting groups. For example, "The students are grouped by age" versus "The students are grouped into age categories."
What's the difference between "are clustered into" and "are grouped into"?
Are clustered into often implies a natural grouping based on similarities, while "are grouped into" suggests a more deliberate or arbitrary organization. The context dictates the more appropriate choice.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested