are calamitous

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are calamitous" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe situations, events, or actions that are disastrous or catastrophic in nature. Example: "The consequences of the decision are calamitous, leading to widespread devastation in the community."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

"As you can see, conditions are calamitous," she said.

The New York Times

Twelve drawings representing signs of the zodiac, each with a caption telling of future events, all of which are calamitous.

The New Yorker

If the circumstances are calamitous enough, clubs can also crash out of a cup, or even be unceremoniously dumped out.

The Guardian - Sport

If it's volume, it has hardly any meaning to the main point of contention between us — which is whether coming Arctic changes are calamitous to ecosystems, and human affairs, or not.

The New York Times

By Jack Ziegler The New Yorker, December 3 , 1984P. 44 Twelve drawings representing signs of the zodiac, each with a caption telling of future events, all of which are calamitous.

The New Yorker

If that weren't the case, then I wouldn't have seen 50 articles about how slow Black Friday sales are "calamitous" for the nation.

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

The result was calamitous.

The New York Times

The consequences can be calamitous.

The Economist

The results were calamitous.

The New Yorker

Danilo was calamitous again.

The Guardian - Sport

The result has been calamitous.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are calamitous" when you want to emphasize the disastrous nature of a situation with a slightly formal tone, particularly in news reporting or academic writing.

Common error

Avoid using "are calamitous" in casual conversation or informal writing. Simpler synonyms like "are disastrous" or "are terrible" may be more appropriate for everyday communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are calamitous" functions as a predicative adjective phrase, modifying a noun or pronoun to describe a state or condition of being disastrous or catastrophic. Ludwig indicates this usage is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are calamitous" is a grammatically correct adjective phrase used to describe situations with disastrous or catastrophic consequences. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. While not overly common, it is suitable for formal writing and news reporting. Alternatives include "are disastrous" or "are catastrophic". The primary context of use is in News & Media.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are disastrous

A more common and direct synonym, lacking the formal tone of "calamitous".

are catastrophic

Similar in meaning, but often implies a larger scale of devastation.

are devastating

Focuses on the emotional impact of the disastrous events.

are ruinous

Emphasizes the destructive aspect, suggesting irreparable damage.

are fateful

Highlights the significance and inevitable consequences of events.

are tragic

Emphasizes the sorrowful and unfortunate nature of the events.

are destructive

Focuses on the act of destruction, rather than the overall outcome.

are dire

Implies extreme urgency and danger in the situation.

are cataclysmic

Suggests a sudden and violent upheaval or change.

are unfortunate

A milder term implying bad luck or negative circumstances.

FAQs

How can I use "are calamitous" in a sentence?

You can use "are calamitous" to describe events or situations that are disastrous or catastrophic. For example, "The consequences of the policy changes "are calamitous" for the local economy".

What can I say instead of "are calamitous"?

You can use alternatives like "are disastrous", "are catastrophic", or "are devastating", depending on the specific context and desired emphasis.

Is "are calamitous" suitable for formal writing?

Yes, "are calamitous" is well-suited for formal writing, especially in news reports and academic papers, where a more sophisticated vocabulary is appropriate.

What's the difference between "are calamitous" and "are unfortunate"?

"Are unfortunate" suggests a negative situation due to bad luck, while "are calamitous" implies a disastrous event with widespread negative consequences.