are attributed to

USAGE SUMMARY

"are attributed to" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is usually used when giving credit or attributing something to someone or something else. For example: The success of the project is attributed to the hard work of the team members.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Many wondrous feats are attributed to him.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Many reasons are attributed to this decline.

Stanford University

losses are attributed to optical reasons.

Opto-Electronics Review

Most are attributed to the Middle Palaeolithic.

Quaternary International

These days, shortcomings are attributed to competence rather than ideology.

The Guardian

Many of them are attributed to King David.

The Guardian - Opinion

Increasingly, these recent climate changes are attributed to human activities.

Columbia University

Both of these detections are attributed to wild birds.

Cornell University

About 28 paintings are attributed to Ando himself.

Britannica

No important discoveries are attributed to Gassendi's scientific program.

Encyclopedia Britannica

All manner of economic ills are attributed to the place.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are attributed to" when you want to give credit or identify the source of something, whether it's a discovery, an action, or a characteristic.

Common error

Be sure to verify your sources before using "are attributed to". False attribution can undermine your credibility and spread misinformation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are attributed to" functions as a passive voice construction. It signifies that something is being credited, associated, or assigned to a particular cause, source, or person. Ludwig examples show its versatility across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

32%

Academia

11%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "are attributed to" is a versatile and grammatically sound phrase used to credit, associate, or assign something to a particular cause or source. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a correct and usable phrase across various contexts. Predominantly featured in scientific and news domains, its function is to identify sources objectively. When using this phrase, ensure accurate sourcing to maintain credibility. Consider alternative phrases such as ""are credited to"" or ""are linked to"" for nuanced meaning. Remember that clear and verified attribution enhances your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are credited to

Focuses on giving recognition or acknowledgement for something.

are ascribed to

Implies assigning a quality or characteristic to something.

are linked to

Highlights a connection or association between two things.

are due to

Indicates a direct cause-and-effect relationship.

stem from

Emphasizes the origin or starting point of something.

result from

Focuses on the outcome or consequence of something.

originate from

Highlights the place or point where something begins.

are caused by

Directly states the cause of an event or situation.

are a consequence of

Emphasizes that something is a result of a previous action or event.

can be explained by

Offers a reason or justification for something.

FAQs

How can I use "are attributed to" in a sentence?

Use "are attributed to" when you want to indicate the cause, origin, or source of something. For example: "The increasing sea temperatures "are attributed to" climate change."

What phrases are similar in meaning to "are attributed to"?

Alternatives to "are attributed to" include "are credited to", "are ascribed to", or "are linked to", depending on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use "are attributed to"?

It's appropriate when you want to formally acknowledge or assign a cause, origin, or characteristic to something, based on evidence or belief. Using "are due to" could also be appropriate, but only when you're expressing direct causality.

What's the difference between "are attributed to" and "are caused by"?

"Are caused by" implies a direct cause-and-effect relationship, while ""are attributed to"" suggests a possible cause or source based on available information or belief. The former is more definitive.