are assigned with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are assigned with" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct usage would typically be "are assigned" or "are assigned to." Example: "The team members are assigned to various projects based on their expertise."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Darker colors represent nodes that are assigned with statistical significance, while lighter colors represent non-significant assignments.

Plosone

There are 22 seats at the table, and they are assigned, with the head coach at head and others placed next to him based on order of importance.

The New York Times - Sports

Instead, handicaps are assigned with the specific objective of giving all the horses in a race an equal chance of winning.

Encyclopedia Britannica

You've got 130-plus executive directors, most of whom are from law enforcement and the military, who are assigned with security, not just with cargo and passengers, but people who have access to the airports and airplanes generally.

The New York Times

Initially all gateways are assigned with a value of 100%.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The anisotropic material properties of the constituents are assigned with proper orientations.

Advances in Engineering Software

This procedure continues iteratively until all voxels are assigned with class labels (object or background).

EJNMMI Research

In Gaussian filter, surrounding pixels are assigned with different Gaussian weight and then are averaged.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

The swara syllable letters are from the English alphabet and are assigned with the maximum priority.

EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing

The prior likelihoods are assigned with a default or configured value.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

On the basis of their comparative occurrence in practice, the disturbances are assigned with relative scores.

Journal of Industrial Engineering International

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Replace "are assigned with" with the grammatically correct alternatives "are assigned" or "are assigned to" to ensure clarity and precision in your writing. Although "are assigned with" is relatively common, especially in scientific writing, avoid it for a more professional and polished tone.

Common error

The most frequent error is using "with" after "assigned" when it's unnecessary. "Assigned" already implies an allocation or designation. Reserve "with" for situations where you're describing a tool or method used during the assignment process; otherwise, stick to "are assigned" or "are assigned to".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are assigned with" functions as a passive construction where something is being allocated or designated, typically followed by a noun phrase describing what is being assigned and then connected by a prepositional phrase. However, according to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically incorrect.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

90%

News & Media

7%

Encyclopedias

1%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "are assigned with" is frequently encountered, particularly in scientific and news contexts, it's grammatically questionable and deemed incorrect by Ludwig AI. The correct alternatives include "are assigned" or "are assigned to". The phrase serves the function of indicating allocation or designation, predominantly within formal settings. Despite its common usage, opting for grammatically sound alternatives enhances clarity and credibility. Key sources employing this phrase include journals, news outlets, and encyclopedias, emphasizing its broad but potentially flawed application across various disciplines.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are assigned to

Adding "to" makes the phrase grammatically correct, indicating the recipient of the assignment.

are designated for

"Designated" implies a specific purpose or role for which something is assigned.

are allocated to

"Allocated" suggests a formal distribution or apportionment of resources or tasks.

are tasked with

"Tasked" emphasizes the responsibility or duty associated with the assignment.

are entrusted with

"Entrusted" implies a level of trust or confidence in the recipient of the assignment.

are given

A simpler alternative that focuses on the act of providing something.

are appointed to

"Appointed" suggests an official or formal assignment to a position or role.

are credited with

"Credited" implies that someone or something is recognized for having a particular quality or accomplishment.

are charged with

"Charged" emphasizes the responsibility or duty assigned.

are burdened with

"Burdened" suggests the assignment is considered difficult or onerous.

FAQs

Is it grammatically correct to say "are assigned with"?

No, the grammatically correct options are "are assigned" or "are assigned to". While "are assigned with" is used, especially in some scientific writing, it's best to avoid it in formal contexts.

What's the difference between "are assigned" and "are assigned to"?

"Are assigned" generally implies the act of allocation, while "are assigned to" specifies the recipient of the assignment. For example, "Tasks are assigned" versus "Tasks "are assigned to" team members".

What are some alternatives to "are assigned with"?

You can use alternatives like ""are assigned to"", "are designated for", or "are allocated to" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use "are assigned" versus "are tasked with"?

"Are assigned" is a general term for allocation. "Are tasked with" implies that someone is given a specific responsibility or duty. Choose the phrase that best reflects the nature of the assignment.