are assigned to

USAGE SUMMARY

"are assigned to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been allocated to a certain person or group. For example, "The teachers are assigned to different classrooms."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They are assigned to one specific facility.

The New York Times

Groups that are assigned to targets. 1.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Sections are assigned to all students.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

That is what our sailors are assigned to do now.

The New Yorker

Points are assigned to each category and weighted.

The New York Times

Junior lawyers are assigned to track the media conglomerates.

The New York Times

They must take whatever lawyers are assigned to them.

The New York Times

(He would not disclose how numbers are assigned to letters).

The New York Times

They are assigned to certain markets and days.

The New York Times

Accordingly, these tracts are assigned to distinct clusters.

Nature

KING: And how many agents are assigned to this project?

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are assigned to", ensure the context clearly indicates who or what is doing the assigning and who or what is being assigned. Clarity is key for effective communication.

Common error

Avoid using "are assigned to" in a way that obscures who is responsible for the assignment. Rephrasing to active voice (e.g., "The manager assigns tasks to the team") can enhance clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are assigned to" functions as a passive verb phrase. It indicates that a subject receives an assignment or allocation, as shown in Ludwig's examples where tasks, people, or resources are designated for a specific purpose. It is commonly used to describe responsibilities, duties, or placements.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

31%

News & Media

30%

Academia

26%

Less common in

Formal & Business

13%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "are assigned to" is a grammatically correct and very common passive verb phrase used to indicate that something has been allocated or designated to a specific person, group, or purpose. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is widely applicable across various contexts, from scientific research to news reporting and academic assignments. When using this phrase, ensure clarity in indicating both the assigner and the assignee to avoid ambiguity. Related phrases, such as "are allocated to" or "are designated for", offer alternative ways to express similar meanings with slightly different nuances. Keep in mind its frequency with scientific, news and academia contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are allocated to

Focuses on the distribution aspect, implying a planned allocation.

are designated for

Emphasizes purpose or intended use.

are appointed to

Suggests a more formal selection or nomination process.

are entrusted with

Highlights the responsibility and trust associated with the task.

are tasked with

Focuses on the assignment of a specific task or duty.

are delegated to

Implies the act of giving authority or responsibility to someone else.

are given to

A more general way of saying something is provided to someone.

are referred to

Focuses on how something is named or identified.

are attributed to

Highlights the assignment of a quality or characteristic.

are connected with

Indicates an association or link, rather than a direct assignment.

FAQs

How can I use "are assigned to" in a sentence?

You can use "are assigned to" to indicate that someone or something has been given a specific task, role, or location. For example, "The new recruits "are assigned to" different departments."

What's the difference between "are assigned to" and "are allocated to"?

"Are assigned to" implies a specific task or role is given, while "are allocated to" suggests resources or quantities are distributed. For instance, personnel "are assigned to" a project, but funds "are allocated to" different departments.

What can I say instead of "are assigned to"?

Alternatives include "are designated for", "are tasked with", or "are entrusted with", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "are assigned to"?

While "are assigned to" is grammatically correct, using the active voice can sometimes improve clarity. Instead of "Tasks "are assigned to" employees", you could say "Managers assign tasks to employees" for more direct communication.