are almost nonexistent

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are almost nonexistent" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is very rare or nearly absent in a particular context. Example: "In this region, public transportation options are almost nonexistent, making it difficult for residents to commute."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Black men are almost nonexistent.

The New York Times

Jobs are almost nonexistent.

The Washington Post

Internet connections are almost nonexistent.

The New York Times

Coin phones are almost nonexistent.

The New York Times - Travel

"They are almost nonexistent," Mr. Sacconaghi said.

The New York Times - Tech

Your Sexual Privileges are almost nonexistent".

The New Yorker

Unions are almost nonexistent in apparel factories.

The New York Times

Nonsmoking sections in restaurants are almost nonexistent.

The New York Times

Similarities beyond the court are almost nonexistent.

The New York Times - Sports

Arboreal snakes are few, and arboreal lizards are almost nonexistent.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Hostile takeovers are almost nonexistent, as is shareholder activism.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are almost nonexistent" to accurately convey that something is extremely rare or practically absent in a given context. Ensure that the context clearly supports this claim.

Common error

Avoid using "are almost nonexistent" when something is merely uncommon or infrequent but still reasonably present. Overstating the absence can diminish the credibility of your statement. If something exist, use "are rare" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are almost nonexistent" serves as a descriptive expression, functioning as a predicate adjective to indicate that something is present in such a minimal quantity as to be functionally absent. As per Ludwig AI, it is deemed correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

29%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are almost nonexistent" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to describe something that is exceedingly rare or practically absent. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a valid and useful phrase across various domains. Predominantly found in news and scientific contexts, its neutral register makes it versatile for both formal and informal communication. Remember to use it accurately to avoid overstating absence, and consider using synonyms like "are virtually absent" or "are rarely seen" for nuanced expressions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are virtually absent

Emphasizes the near-complete absence, implying only a theoretical possibility of existence.

are practically nonexistent

Highlights the practical absence, suggesting that while they might exist, they are not relevant in practice.

are nearly absent

Indicates that the subject is close to being completely gone or unavailable.

are hardly found

Suggests that something is rare and difficult to locate.

scarcely exist

Highlights the rare existence of a subject.

are few and far between

Highlights the infrequency and wide distribution of the subject.

are in short supply

Focuses on the limited availability or quantity of something.

are rarely seen

Indicates that the subject is not commonly observed or encountered.

are thin on the ground

Implies that the presence of something is sparse or scattered.

are like hen's teeth

An idiomatic expression indicating extreme rarity.

FAQs

How can I use "are almost nonexistent" in a sentence?

Use "are almost nonexistent" to describe something that is very rare or practically absent. For example, "Job opportunities in that field "are almost nonexistent" in the current economy".

What's a good alternative to "are almost nonexistent"?

Alternatives include "are virtually absent", "are rarely seen", or "scarcely exist", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "are almost nonexistent"?

Yes, "are almost nonexistent" is grammatically correct. It uses the verb "are" appropriately with the adjective phrase "almost nonexistent" to describe a state of near absence.

What is the difference between "are almost nonexistent" and "are completely nonexistent"?

"Are almost nonexistent" implies that something is extremely rare but might still exist in some form. "Are completely nonexistent", on the other hand, indicates that something does not exist at all.