Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

are a class of

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are a class of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to categorize or define a group of items, concepts, or entities that share common characteristics. Example: "Mammals are a class of animals characterized by the presence of mammary glands."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Mammals, we learned in school, are a class of vertebrates.

Crossed cubes are a class of promising parallel communication patterns.

Ketones are a class of important organic compounds.

Fullerenes are a class of molecules composed entirely of carbon.

Fluorinated indolylfulgides are a class of photochromic organic compounds.

In their bashing of the Leap Manifesto, pundits pretend they are a class of disinterested commentators.

News & Media

The Guardian

Neonicotinoids are a class of pesticide which act as an insect nerve agent.

News & Media

The Guardian

Leptons are a class of particles that do not interact strongly with matter.

News & Media

The New York Times

Antacids are a class of medications that act by directly neutralizing gastric acid.

Science & Research

Nature

Therefore,, are a class of consistent distributions on.

Linearisable discrete systems are a class of their own.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "are a class of", ensure that the characteristics defining the class are clearly stated to provide context and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "are a class of" when referring to items that are only superficially similar. Make sure the members of the class share fundamental characteristics, not just superficial resemblances.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are a class of" serves as a definitional tool, categorizing entities based on shared characteristics. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English. It is used to establish a hierarchical relationship where the subject belongs to a broader classification.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

63%

News & Media

24%

Wiki

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are a class of" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression used for categorization and definition. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and suitable for use in written English. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, this phrase is best utilized when clearly defining the shared characteristics of the items being classified. To avoid vagueness, ensure that the defining features of the class are explicitly stated. For varied expression, consider alternatives such as "belong to a category of" or "are a type of". This analysis underscores the importance of precise categorization for clear and effective communication.

FAQs

How can I use "are a class of" in a sentence?

Use "are a class of" to categorize entities that share specific traits. For example, "Opioids "are a class of" drugs that include oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, morphine, fentanyl, and many others."

What are some alternatives to "are a class of"?

You can use phrases like "belong to a category of", "are a type of", or "can be categorized as" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "is a class of" instead of "are a class of"?

No, use "is a class of" when referring to a singular entity that represents the entire class. For plural entities, the correct form is ""are a class of"."

What's the difference between "are a class of" and "include"?

"Are a class of" defines a category, while "include" lists members within that category. For example, "Mammals are a class of vertebrates" defines mammals, while "Mammals include humans, dogs, and cats" lists examples of mammals.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: