applied in

USAGE SUMMARY

"applied in" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when trying to describe an action such as applying a certain concept or technique to a situation or context. For example, "Our team has successfully applied in a new strategy to increase efficiency."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

We first applied in 1963.

Independent

They applied in 1987.

The Guardian

She applied in 1983.

The New York Times

This distinction is applied in this article.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Color is applied in short dabs.

The New York Times - Arts

Neither applied in this case, he said.

Independent

Was the death penalty applied in Guinea?

The New Yorker

All this applied in the Jackson case.

The Economist

The same applied in all the professions.

Encyclopedia Britannica

How is it applied in sharia states?

The Guardian

Now they must be applied in Afghanistan.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "applied in", ensure the context clearly specifies where or how the application is taking place. This enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid assuming the audience understands the specific area where something is "applied in". Always provide explicit details to prevent confusion and ensure effective communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "applied in" functions as a verb phrase with a preposition, indicating the action of using or implementing something within a specific context. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically sound and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

29%

Encyclopedias

6%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "applied in" is a grammatically correct and very common construction used to describe the implementation of a method, principle, or technique within a specific context. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's broadly accepted in written English. Its usage spans various domains, including News & Media, Science, and Encyclopedias, with a generally neutral to professional register. To ensure clarity, always explicitly state the context in which something is being applied. While it can be replaced with alternatives such as "implemented within" or "utilized in", the specific choice depends on the nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

implemented within

Focuses on the act of putting something into effect within a specific framework.

utilized in

Emphasizes the practical use of something for a particular purpose.

employed within

Highlights the engagement of something for a specific application or function.

relevant in

Indicates the pertinence or applicability of something in a specific situation.

pertinent to

Highlights something's direct relation or significance to a matter.

used within

Focuses on the act of using something within a specific framework.

practiced in

Emphasizes the routine or habitual application of something.

holds true in

Indicates the validity or accuracy of something in a particular context.

adhered to in

Highlights the act of sticking to rules or agreements within a specific context.

fitting in

Emphasizes the suitability or compatibility of something within a context.

FAQs

How can I use "applied in" in a sentence?

Use "applied in" to describe a situation where a principle, method, or technique is being used or implemented in a particular context. For example, "The same principle is "applied in" both cases."

What are some alternatives to using "applied in"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "implemented within", "utilized in", or "employed within".

Is there a difference between "applied in" and "used in"?

While both phrases indicate usage, "applied in" often implies a more formal or structured implementation of something, whereas "used in" is a more general term for usage.

When is it more appropriate to use "applied in" versus "relevant to"?

"Applied in" is best when describing the direct act of putting something to use. "Relevant to", on the other hand, indicates a relationship or pertinence without necessarily implying direct usage.