application was not kept

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "application was not kept" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the status or handling of an application, indicating that it was not retained or stored properly. Example: "Due to a technical error, the application was not kept in our records, and we are unable to process it."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

A written record was not kept.

BMC Cancer

Score is not kept.

WikiHow

"His application was not rejected.

BBC

The application was not withdrawn.

The New York Times

Unfortunately, my application was not successful.

The Guardian

My application wasn't a new application.

The New Yorker

The application wasn't hard.

The Guardian

The "Adobe Reader" application is not an open-able application.

WikiHow

A bigger screen and more applications were not enough to keep Singapore student Jiahao Neo from recently ditching his first Samsung smartphone, which he had used for a year and a half.

BBC

The wiretap applications are not public records.

The New York Times

Applications are not handed out willy-nilly.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "application was not kept", ensure the context clearly indicates what caused the application to not be retained, such as a technical error or a procedural oversight.

Common error

Avoid using "application was not kept" without clarifying the reason. This may lead the audience to assume deliberate action, even if it was accidental. Always provide context or explanation for clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "application was not kept" functions as a statement indicating that a particular application was not retained or stored. Ludwig AI's analysis confirms that it's grammatically correct, and the examples show its use in various contexts to convey a lack of record-keeping.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Science

33%

Wiki

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "application was not kept" is a grammatically correct statement indicating that an application was not retained or stored, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. While relatively rare, its usage is primarily found in Science, News & Media, and Wiki contexts. The phrase serves to inform the audience about the lack of record-keeping, with alternative phrases like "application was not retained" or "application was not stored" offering similar meanings. When using the phrase, it's important to clarify the reason behind the application's non-retention to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

application wasn't retained

Uses 'retained' instead of 'kept', emphasizing the act of holding onto something.

application wasn't stored

Replaces 'kept' with 'stored', highlighting the act of saving data.

application was not filed

Focuses on the action of placing the application into a filing system.

application was not preserved

Emphasizes the lack of protection or maintenance of the application.

application was not saved

Highlights that the application data wasn't recorded or stored digitally.

application was discarded

Indicates the application was thrown away or removed.

application was not archived

Highlights the absence of long-term storage for the application.

application wasn't cataloged

Focuses on the lack of recording the application in a catalog or register.

application wasn't maintained

Emphasizes the lack of upkeep or preservation of the application data.

the application's record was lost

Shifts the focus to the loss of the record associated with the application.

FAQs

What does "application was not kept" mean?

The phrase "application was not kept" means that an application, such as a form or a request, was not retained, stored, or saved. This could be due to various reasons, including technical errors, procedural oversights, or intentional actions.

What can I say instead of "application was not kept"?

You can use alternatives like "application was not retained", "application was not stored", or "application was discarded" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "application was not kept" or "application wasn't kept"?

Both "application was not kept" and "application wasn't kept" are grammatically correct. The latter is a contraction and is more informal, while the former is more formal.

In what situations would you use "application was not kept"?

You would use "application was not kept" when you want to state that an application was not saved, retained, or stored. This could be in the context of a technical issue, a procedural error, or a deliberate action. For instance, you might say, "Due to a system error, the "application was not kept" in our records".