Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
apple to apples
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "apple to apples" is not correct; the correct expression is "apples to apples." You can use it when comparing two similar items or situations to highlight their similarities
Example: "When evaluating the two proposals, we need to ensure we are making an apples to apples comparison to get an accurate assessment."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
It also will allow you to have a better chance of having an apple to apple comparison of different systems.
Science
Make fewer "apples to apples" comparisons.
News & Media
Make fewer "apples to apples" comparisons.
News & Media
Those familiar with "Apples to Apples" will recognise the rules.
News & Media
Similar accounting standards allows us to compare apples to apples.
News & Media
Players who come in ready to deal with adversity, apples to apples, are ready to win".
News & Media
But if you want to compare apples to apples, the report does not quite add up.
News & Media
"You have to make sure you're comparing apples to apples," he said.
News & Media
Rivals like Mattel are doing the same with games like Apples to Apples.
News & Media
"It's not apples to apples," said Dianna Boyce, a spokeswoman for the Indianapolis host committee.
News & Media
It should be cautioned that the comparisons are not quite apples to apples.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use the correct form, "apples to apples", to ensure grammatical accuracy and clarity in your writing.
Common error
Avoid using "apple to apples". The idiom is "apples to apples", emphasizing a comparison between multiple, similar items, not a single one.
Source & Trust
79%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "apple to apples" is an incorrect form of the idiom. The correct form, "apples to apples", functions as an adverbial phrase modifying a verb, clarifying how a comparison should be made. As Ludwig AI points out, the correct form is "apples to apples".
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "apple to apples" is grammatically incorrect; the correct form is "apples to apples". This idiom is used to describe a comparison between similar items, ensuring a fair and accurate assessment. As Ludwig AI notes, using the correct form, "apples to apples", is crucial for maintaining clarity and credibility in writing. Alternatives such as "like for like" or "similar items" can be used for variety. Remember to avoid the singular form to maintain grammatical accuracy.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
comparing similar items
Highlights the act of contrasting things that are alike.
like for like comparison
Focuses on a direct comparison of equivalent items, emphasizing fairness.
equivalent comparison
Underscores the equality and fairness in the comparison.
fair comparison
Emphasizes impartiality and equal footing in the comparison.
comparing on equal terms
Focuses on ensuring both items are judged by the same criteria.
assessing equitably
Highlights the just and unbiased evaluation of similar items.
evaluating consistently
Focuses on using the same standards throughout the evaluation.
uniform assessment
Describes a standardized and consistent method of evaluation.
apples and oranges
This phrase describes comparing two things that are fundamentally different.
apples to oranges
Expresses comparing dissimilar things instead of similar ones, highlighting differences.
FAQs
How to use the phrase "apples to apples" correctly?
Use "apples to apples" to describe a comparison made between like or similar things. For example, "We need to make an apples to apples comparison to evaluate these proposals fairly".
What does "apples to apples" mean?
The idiom "apples to apples" means comparing similar items or situations. It ensures a fair and accurate assessment by avoiding discrepancies.
Which is correct, "apple to apples" or "apples to apples"?
"Apples to apples" is the correct and commonly used form. "Apple to apples" is grammatically incorrect.
What can I say instead of "apples to apples"?
You can use alternatives like "like for like", "similar items", or "on equal terms" depending on the context.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
79%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested