Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
angry with me
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "angry with me" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when expressing someone's feelings of anger directed towards you. Example: "I could tell she was angry with me after our disagreement about the project."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Formal & Business
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
54 human-written examples
My wife, also, was angry with me.
News & Media
I figured she was angry with me.
News & Media
But they were very angry with me".
News & Media
"But he was angry with me.
News & Media
I became more angry with me".
News & Media
"Don't be angry with me, Irving," he said.
News & Media
For their sake, don't be angry with me".
News & Media
He's also still angry with me, I'm pretty sure.
News & Media
But this fellow was angry with me for being Scottish".
News & Media
Only once did George become angry with me.
News & Media
She seems angry – with me, and maybe with herself.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Ensure that the context clarifies the reason for the anger to avoid ambiguity. Providing specific details will make your message more understandable.
Common error
While "angry with me" is generally correct, be careful not to overuse "angry at" in all situations. "Angry at" is typically used for situations or things, whereas "angry with" is used for people. Pay attention to the object of your anger to ensure correct usage.
Source & Trust
91%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "angry with me" functions as a predicative adjective phrase, describing the emotional state of another person in relation to the speaker. It indicates that someone is experiencing anger directed towards the speaker. Ludwig provides numerous examples illustrating its use in diverse contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
78%
Formal & Business
10%
Science
12%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "angry with me" is a grammatically correct and very common expression used to describe someone's feeling of anger towards the speaker. Ludwig AI affirms its proper usage and provides numerous real-world examples. It is most frequently found in news and media contexts and has a neutral register. When using this phrase, consider the intensity of the emotion you wish to convey and ensure you are using "with" when referring to a person rather than a situation. Alternatives include "mad at me" or "upset with me", depending on the context.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
mad at me
A more informal and direct way to express anger.
upset with me
Indicates a milder form of anger or disappointment.
annoyed with me
Suggests a feeling of irritation rather than intense anger.
irritated with me
Similar to annoyed, implying slight anger.
cross with me
A slightly old-fashioned expression for being angry.
displeased with me
A formal way of saying someone is not happy with your actions.
furious with me
Indicates a very high level of anger.
indignant with me
Suggests anger mixed with a sense of injustice.
resentful toward me
Implies a lingering feeling of anger and bitterness.
bitter at me
Indicates deep-seated anger and disappointment.
FAQs
How can I use "angry with me" in a sentence?
You can use "angry with me" to express that someone feels anger towards you. For example, "She was "angry with me" after I forgot her birthday."
What's a more informal way to say "angry with me"?
A more informal alternative is "mad at me". It carries a similar meaning but is suitable for casual conversation.
Which is correct, "angry with me" or "angry at me" when referring to a person?
When expressing someone's anger towards you as a person, ""angry with me"" is generally preferred. "Angry at" is more commonly used for things or situations.
What's the difference between "upset with me" and "angry with me"?
"Upset with me" suggests a milder form of displeasure or disappointment, while ""angry with me"" indicates a stronger feeling of resentment or irritation.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
91%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested