Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

analyzed with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "analyzed with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the method or tool used to analyze data or information. Example: "The data was analyzed with advanced statistical software to ensure accuracy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Data were analyzed with SPM12.

Science & Research

Nature

Data were analyzed with the FlowJo software.

Science & Research

Nature

Data were analyzed with software Immunospot 5.0.32.

Science & Research

Nature

Data were analyzed with M3 Vision software.

Science & Research

Nature

F and F0 were analyzed with Fiji.

Science & Research

Nature

Graphics are analyzed with acuity and gusto.

Results were analyzed with ANOVA.

mEPSCs were detected and analyzed with the MiniAnalyses software (Synaptosoft).

Science & Research

Nature

Morphometric data were then analyzed with MandibLever v3.530.

Science & Research

Nature

Differential gene expression was analyzed with R/Bioconductor package limma.

Science & Research

Nature

EEG data recordings were analyzed with SleepSign software.

Science & Research

Nature
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "analyzed with", ensure that the tool or method specified is clearly defined and relevant to the context. This helps maintain clarity and avoids ambiguity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "analyzed with" without specifying the software or method clearly. For example, instead of saying "the data were analyzed with software", specify "the data were analyzed with SPSS software" for better clarity and precision.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "analyzed with" functions as a verbal phrase indicating the method or tool used to perform an analysis. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically sound and widely used. The examples provided by Ludwig illustrate its use across various domains, predominantly in scientific and academic contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

85%

Academia

8%

News & Media

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "analyzed with" is a grammatically correct and versatile phrase used to specify the tools or methods employed in an analysis. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is widespread, particularly within scientific and academic contexts. The phrase is best suited for formal writing, where clarity and precision are paramount. To enhance clarity, always specify the exact software or method used. While alternatives like "examined using" and "assessed via" exist, "analyzed with" remains a direct and effective way to convey the analytical process. The authoritative sources provided by Ludwig highlight the phrase's consistent use in reputable publications.

FAQs

How can I use "analyzed with" in a sentence?

Use "analyzed with" to indicate the tool, method, or software used for conducting an analysis. For instance, "The survey data was "analyzed with" SPSS to identify significant trends."

What are some alternatives to "analyzed with"?

You can use alternatives such as "examined using", "assessed via", or "evaluated through" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "data was analyzed with" or "data were analyzed with"?

While "data" is technically plural, it's often treated as singular in modern usage, especially in informal contexts. However, in formal or scientific writing, "data were "analyzed with"" is preferred.

What's the difference between "analyzed with" and "analyzed by"?

"Analyzed with" specifies the tool or method used for analysis, while "analyzed by" indicates who or what performed the analysis. For example, "The results were "analyzed with" specific software" (tool) versus "The results were analyzed by a statistician" (person).

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: