analysis is flawed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "analysis is flawed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when critiquing or evaluating the quality of an analysis, indicating that there are errors or weaknesses in it. Example: "The report's conclusions are not reliable because the analysis is flawed."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

27 human-written examples

This analysis is flawed.

The New York Times

"The analysis is flawed," he said.

The New York Times - Health

But this economic analysis is flawed.

The New York Times

"We tried very hard to show the R.P.A. where their analysis is flawed," Mr. Doctoroff said.

The New York Times

"Their analysis is flawed," said an agency spokesman, Albert W. O'Leary.

The New York Times

George Ou's final complaint is that our price analysis is flawed for three reasons.

Harvard University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

33 human-written examples

SABMiller said the analysis was flawed.

The Economist

But the court said Tuesday that the analysis was flawed.

The New York Times

The commission found that the Pinto analysis was flawed.

The New York Times

A company spokesman said it appeared that the agency's analysis was flawed.

The New York Times

For all the crystalline brilliance of his writing, Orwell's political analysis was flawed.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When critiquing an analysis, be specific about the flaws. Provide concrete examples or explain the reasoning behind your assessment.

Common error

Avoid simply stating that "the analysis is flawed" without providing any supporting evidence or explanation. This lacks credibility and offers no constructive feedback.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "analysis is flawed" serves as a critical assessment, indicating that the process of breaking down and examining a subject is deficient in some way. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable. Examples in Ludwig show this phrase used to critique economic reports, scientific studies, and political commentary.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Academia

30%

Science

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "analysis is flawed" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression for critiquing an assessment. As Ludwig AI confirms, it’s appropriate across various contexts, particularly in News & Media, Academia, and Science. The key is to provide specific reasons when using this phrase to avoid overgeneralization. Related phrases like "the analysis contains inaccuracies" or "the analysis is based on faulty reasoning" can offer more precise critiques. Ludwig examples showcase that this phrase is used to challenge the validity of conclusions across economics, science, and politics.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the analysis is based on faulty reasoning

Points out that the logic behind the analysis is incorrect.

the analytical approach is misguided

Highlights that the method chosen for the analysis was wrong.

the analysis contains inaccuracies

Focuses on specific inaccuracies within the analysis.

the analysis is not well-supported

Suggests the analysis lacks sufficient evidence.

the analysis is fundamentally unsound

Highlights a deep, underlying problem with the analysis.

the analysis is questionable

Raises doubts about the validity of the analysis.

the assessment is fundamentally wrong

Emphasizes a severe error or inaccuracy in the assessment.

the analysis suffers from deficiencies

Emphasizes that the analysis is lacking in certain areas.

the analysis presents an incomplete picture

Suggests the analysis doesn't consider all relevant aspects.

the analysis is demonstrably false

Indicates the analysis can be proven to be untrue.

FAQs

How can I use "analysis is flawed" in a sentence?

You can use "analysis is flawed" to express disagreement with an assessment, as in "While the report presents interesting data, the "analysis is flawed" because it doesn't account for external factors."

What are some alternatives to saying "analysis is flawed"?

Alternatives include "analysis is incorrect", "analysis has issues", or "analysis is unsound" depending on the specific context.

Is it more appropriate to say "analysis is flawed" or "analysis has flaws"?

Both are acceptable, but ""analysis is flawed"" is more direct, while "analysis has flaws" might be perceived as slightly less critical.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "analysis is flawed"?

Use ""analysis is flawed"" when you have identified specific errors, omissions, or biases that undermine the validity of the analysis. Always aim to provide supporting evidence for your claim.