ample precedent for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "ample precedent for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing situations or decisions that have been supported by previous examples or cases in a particular context. Example: "There is ample precedent for granting leniency in cases where the offender shows genuine remorse."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

26 human-written examples

There's ample precedent for this.

The Guardian - Money

There is ample precedent for this approach.

The New York Times

There is ample precedent for a Congressional response.

The Guardian - Business

There is ample precedent for the kind of upheaval that Dr. Brown helped to create.

The New York Times - Books

Florida, indeed, offers ample precedent for successful election challenges that topple victors.

The New York Times

There is ample precedent for such official religiosity in time of war.

The New York Times - Magazine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

29 human-written examples

There are ample precedents for the judge's statement.

The New York Times

There are also ample precedents for the use of this method in studying femoral head osteonecrosis and hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

There is ample precedent from WWII for such a militarily muscular government-in-exile.

Forbes

There is ample precedent, therefore, for the Congress to define subclasses for special tax treatment.

Huffington Post

Ample precedent is found for a strong rally once a war begins, Mr. Kleintop said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "ample precedent for", ensure that the precedent you are referring to is directly relevant and clearly supports your argument or decision. Avoid relying on loosely related examples.

Common error

Avoid using "ample precedent for" if the existing examples are weak, isolated, or significantly different from the current situation. Overstating the strength of the precedent can undermine your credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "ample precedent for" functions as a determiner phrase followed by a preposition. It serves to qualify a noun or noun phrase by indicating that there are sufficient prior instances or examples to support or justify something. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "ample precedent for" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression that indicates sufficient prior examples support a claim. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's best suited for neutral to formal contexts like news, academic writing, and professional communication. When employing this phrase, ensure that the precedent is genuinely relevant and adequately supports your argument, avoiding any exaggeration of its strength. Consider alternatives such as "substantial basis for" or "sufficient justification for" to subtly adjust the nuance. Its frequent use in authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Guardian underscores its reliability and acceptance in formal discourse.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

substantial basis for

Emphasizes the solid foundation or justification provided by previous instances.

sufficient justification for

Highlights the adequacy of the prior examples in supporting a particular action or decision.

adequate grounds for

Focuses on the reasonableness and validity of the existing support.

considerable evidence for

Stresses the amount and weight of the supporting documentation or cases.

extensive history of

Highlights a long-standing track record or series of events.

a wealth of examples supporting

Emphasizes the abundance and variety of instances that provide backing.

plenty of instances of

Indicates that many occurrences validate or support the concept.

strong track record of

Highlights a history of success or consistent performance in the relevant area.

established history of

Focuses on the long-term and well-recognized nature of prior occurrences.

demonstrated history of

Stresses that previous examples have actively proven or shown the concept.

FAQs

How can I use "ample precedent for" in a sentence?

Use "ample precedent for" to indicate that there are numerous prior examples or cases supporting a particular action, decision, or argument. For example: "There is "ample precedent for" the court's decision in similar cases".

What are some alternatives to "ample precedent for"?

Alternatives include "substantial basis for", "sufficient justification for", or "adequate grounds for". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "ample precedent for" or "sufficient precedent for"?

Both "ample precedent for" and "sufficient precedent for" are grammatically correct, but "ample" suggests a greater quantity or stronger foundation than "sufficient". Choose the word that best reflects the actual strength and number of prior examples.

What's the difference between "ample precedent for" and "a history of"?

"Ample precedent for" emphasizes the existence of prior examples that support a specific action or decision, while "a history of" simply indicates that something has occurred repeatedly over time, regardless of whether it serves as a justification or support.