Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

amounted to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"amounted to" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is used to describe an accumulation of something or an increase in something over a period of time. For example: "The donations to the charity amounted to over $1 million last year."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Neither amounted to much.

News & Media

The Economist

Exports amounted to $593.4 billion.

News & Media

The Economist

The circulation amounted to betw.

News & Media

The New Yorker

(His prize amounted to $5).

But it amounted to exile.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Desserts amounted to little.

News & Media

The New York Times

Claims amounted to £750m.

News & Media

The Guardian

In 2007 the deals amounted to $29.7m.

But none of it amounted to much.

His policies amounted to de-Stalinization.

Mr Wang said this amounted to torture.

News & Media

Independent
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure the subject of the sentence logically leads to the amount being described. For example, "The total expenses amounted to $500" is correct, while "The weather amounted to $500" would be incorrect.

Common error

Avoid using "amounted to" when you actually mean "resulted in" or "led to". "Amounted to" is about quantity or total, not cause and effect. For instance, don't say "His negligence amounted to the accident"; instead, say "His negligence resulted in the accident".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "amounted to" functions as a verb phrase indicating a final sum or equivalent. It describes the result of accumulation or calculation. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase follows standard grammatical rules and is widely accepted in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Wiki

20%

Science

19%

Less common in

Formal & Business

11%

Encyclopedias

9%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "amounted to" is a versatile and grammatically correct verb phrase used to express a final sum or result. Ludwig AI validates its wide acceptance and adherence to standard grammatical rules. It appears most frequently in news articles and scientific publications, though it is suitable for various writing contexts. While alternatives like "totaled" and "came to" exist, "amounted to" maintains a neutral tone and can be readily used. Just remember to avoid using it when you mean "resulted in" or "caused by".

FAQs

How can I use "amounted to" in a sentence?

Use "amounted to" when you want to express the final sum or total of something. For example, "The total cost of the project "amounted to" $1 million."

What are some alternatives to "amounted to"?

You can use alternatives like "totaled", "came to", or "equaled" depending on the context. For instance, "The donations totaled $5000" is similar to saying "The donations "amounted to" $5000."

Is it correct to say "amounted to be"?

No, it is not correct. "Amounted to" is already a complete verb phrase, so adding "be" is redundant. The correct usage is "The damages "amounted to" $1000", not "The damages amounted to be $1000".

What's the difference between "amounted to" and "attributed to"?

"Amounted to" refers to a sum or total, while "attributed to" means caused by or credited to. "The losses "amounted to" $2 million" indicates the total loss, whereas "The losses were attributed to the hurricane" means the hurricane caused the losses.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: