always missing

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "always missing" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is consistently absent or lacking in a particular context. Example: "Despite my efforts to reach out, his support is always missing when I need it the most."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

That was always missing.

The Guardian - Sport

Loving you always, missing you.

The New York Times

But something, he said, was always missing.

The New York Times

Still grieving, always missing and loving you.

The New York Times

Part of the story is always missing.

The New York Times

"We're always missing somebody," Martin said.

The New York Times - Sports

What happened before that image is always missing.

The New York Times - Magazine

"I was always missing a little bit of something.

The New York Times - Sports

Something's always missing 'til you share it with someone else".

The New York Times

Something was always missing, though, until September 2007.

The New York Times - Sports

It was always missing at least one ingredient, not including the mystery one.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "always missing", ensure the context clearly indicates what is consistently absent or lacking to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid embedding "always missing" in overly complex sentences, as this can obscure the intended meaning. Break down lengthy sentences to improve clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "always missing" functions as a descriptive element, typically modifying a noun or pronoun to indicate a consistent state of absence. Ludwig AI provides examples demonstrating this function in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "always missing" is a versatile and frequently used expression that describes a consistent absence or lack. As Ludwig AI highlights, it's grammatically correct and suitable for various contexts, particularly in news, scientific, and business domains. While alternatives like "constantly absent" or "perpetually lacking" offer subtle shifts in meaning, the core concept remains the same. When using "always missing", ensure clarity by specifying what exactly is consistently absent. By understanding its function, purpose, and common usage patterns, writers can effectively employ this phrase to convey a sense of recurring deficiency or loss.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

constantly absent

Replaces "missing" with "absent", emphasizing a state of being away or not present consistently.

perpetually lacking

Substitutes "missing" with "lacking", highlighting a continuous deficiency or insufficiency.

invariably absent

Uses "invariably" to stress the consistent and unchanging nature of the absence.

consistently absent

Emphasizes the regular and predictable absence, using "consistently" for clarity.

habitually lacking

Implies that the absence is a habitual or customary occurrence.

regularly absent

Highlights the frequency of the absence, focusing on its periodic nature.

ceaselessly wanting

Replaces "missing" with "wanting", stressing an ongoing need or desire that is unfulfilled.

ever absent

Uses "ever" to indicate that the absence is a continuous or timeless condition.

persistently lacking

Highlights the stubborn or unyielding nature of the deficiency.

continually absent

Stresses the ongoing and uninterrupted nature of the absence.

FAQs

How can I use "always missing" in a sentence?

You can use "always missing" to describe something that is consistently absent or lacking. For example, "That sense of urgency is "always missing" when it's ordinary people who are in trouble."

What are some alternatives to "always missing"?

Some alternatives to "always missing" include phrases like "constantly absent", "perpetually lacking", or "invariably absent", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct: "always missing" or "missing always"?

"Always missing" is the correct and more common word order. "Missing always" is less idiomatic and may sound unnatural to native English speakers.

What's the difference between "always missing" and "often missing"?

"Always missing" implies a consistent and predictable absence, while "often missing" suggests that something is frequently, but not invariably, absent. The key difference lies in the degree of consistency.