allowed to establish

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "allowed to establish" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing permissions or rights to create or set up something, such as an organization, system, or process. Example: "The committee is allowed to establish new guidelines for the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"It says government is not allowed to establish a specific religion or irreligion.

The Guardian

They are the most likely to persist if allowed to establish themselves now.

The New York Times

In 1984 foreign banks were allowed to establish branches in Norway.

Britannica

Providers will also be allowed to establish the infrastructure necessary for these systems to operate.

The Guardian

They then are legally allowed to establish the property as their primary or secondary residence.

The Washington Post

Thawed cells were allowed to establish colonies, passaged and grown on coverslips.

Nature

Spectroscopic data allowed to establish the optimal lithium concentration needed to achieve best ionic conductivity.

Polymer

Eventually he was allowed to establish an appropriate monastic centre for the new sect.

Encyclopedia Britannica

On PND90 animals were given alcohol again and allowed to establish stable drinking.

Schizophrenia Research

American news organizations were first allowed to establish resident bureaus in Beijing with the normalization of relations with China.

The New York Times

Corporations are allowed to establish these shell companies in Delaware, as well as in Nevada and Wyoming.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the formality of your writing. While "allowed to establish" is generally suitable, more formal contexts might benefit from synonyms like "authorized to create" or "sanctioned to organize".

Common error

Avoid using "allowed to establish" when the context implies an obligation rather than a permission. For instance, if a regulation requires a company to set up a safety protocol, it's more accurate to say "required to establish" instead of "allowed to establish".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "allowed to establish" functions as a verb phrase indicating permission or the granting of authority to create or set up something. Ludwig examples show its use across diverse contexts, from political scenarios where groups are allowed to establish presences to scientific studies where cells are allowed to establish colonies.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

32%

Encyclopedias

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "allowed to establish" is a common and grammatically correct verb phrase used to indicate that someone has permission or the right to create or set up something. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is versatile and appears in various contexts, including News & Media, Science, and Encyclopedias. When writing, ensure the context clearly specifies who grants permission and what is being established, and consider more formal alternatives like "authorized to create" for professional settings. Avoiding its use when obligation is implied is also crucial. The numerous examples in Ludwig shows its applicability and broad usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

permitted to set up

Replaces "allowed" with "permitted", emphasizing formal consent, and replaces "establish" with "set up", indicating a practical arrangement.

authorized to create

Substitutes "allowed" with "authorized", implying official endorsement, and replaces "establish" with "create", focusing on the act of bringing something into existence.

entitled to form

Uses "entitled" instead of "allowed", suggesting a right or entitlement, and uses "form" in place of "establish", pointing to the act of giving shape to something.

given leave to initiate

Replaces "allowed" with "given leave", indicating granted permission, and uses "initiate" instead of "establish", which focuses on the commencement of an action or project.

empowered to institute

Substitutes "allowed" with "empowered", stressing the granting of power or authority, and replaces "establish" with "institute", suggesting the formal introduction of a system or practice.

given the green light to launch

Replaces "allowed" with "given the green light", which is an idiomatic expression for permission, and "launch" instead of "establish" focuses on the beginning or start of something.

sanctioned to organize

Uses "sanctioned" instead of "allowed", highlighting official approval, and replaces "establish" with "organize", focusing on structuring or arranging.

licensed to build

Substitutes "allowed" with "licensed", indicating formal legal permission, and replaces "establish" with "build", specifically suggesting the construction or development of something.

able to pioneer

Replaces "allowed" with "able", indicating capability, and substitutes "establish" with "pioneer", which highlights the act of being the first to develop or use something.

free to constitute

Uses "free" instead of "allowed", stressing the absence of restrictions, and uses "constitute" instead of "establish", which suggests the act of composing or forming.

FAQs

How can I use "allowed to establish" in a sentence?

You can use "allowed to establish" when indicating that someone has been granted permission or has the right to create or set up something. For example, "The company was "permitted to establish" a new branch in the city".

What are some alternatives to "allowed to establish"?

Some alternatives include "authorized to create", "permitted to set up", or "given leave to initiate", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "allowed to establish" and "required to establish"?

Yes, "allowed to establish" indicates permission, while "required to establish" indicates an obligation. The former suggests a choice, whereas the latter implies a necessity. For example, someone is "allowed to establish" a business but "required to establish" safety protocols.

When is it more appropriate to use "authorized to create" instead of "allowed to establish"?

"Authorized to create" is more appropriate in formal or official contexts, where the permission comes from a recognized authority. "Allowed to establish" is more general and can apply to less formal situations. For instance, an engineer might be "authorized to create" new designs by a company, whereas a group might be "allowed to establish" a club by community rules.