allow on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "allow on" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is unclear in what context it could be used, as it does not form a standard expression or phrase. Example: "Please allow on the new features for the software update." (This is incorrect usage.)

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

36 human-written examples

That level of outside manipulation, wrapped in the faux cloak of "openness", is something that Apple is never going to allow on a device that they make.

TechCrunch

Even airlines in the US are clamping down on what they allow on board, too, shrinking size allowances and becoming more watchful, says USA Today.

Huffington Post

have on deciding what services to allow on mobile phones.

The New Yorker

WHAT did the Senate vote to allow on Thursday morning?

The New York Times

It is unclear, therefore, what the final bill will allow on this crucial matter.

The New York Times

"However many yards we put up or yards we didn't allow on defense, all that, doesn't matter".

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

24 human-written examples

They will allow on-demand viewing or build apps for TV screens.

The New York Times - Tech

It will play songs through a desktop or iPhone app which is still being tested which plays YouTube videos and links to Spotify to allow on-demand.

The Guardian

Some of them allow on-site measurement, while others require sampling.

Construction and Building Materials

New league regulations do not allow on-loan players to oppose their parents clubs.

BBC

When they finally do allow on-platform video, they could be a compelling alternative.

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "allow on" in formal writing. Instead, opt for more precise alternatives such as "permit access to", "enable on", or "authorize on" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Be cautious about using "allow on" as a universal substitute for more specific verbs. The phrase can be vague. Always consider if a more precise verb like "enable", "permit", or "authorize" would improve clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "allow on" functions as a phrasal verb, although its usage is often grammatically questionable. As Ludwig AI points out, it's not always the most appropriate choice and may require more specific verbs for clarity. Examples show it used in contexts of granting access or enabling features.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Wiki

13%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "allow on" is frequently encountered, as confirmed by Ludwig's analysis, but its grammatical correctness is questionable. Ludwig AI identifies it as not conveying a clear meaning in written English and suggests more precise alternatives like "permit access" or "enable on". While "allow on" appears in various contexts, including news, science, and wiki content, it's generally considered informal. For formal writing, it's advisable to opt for grammatically sound alternatives to ensure clarity and precision. The high frequency of use does not equate to grammatical correctness, and careful consideration of context is crucial when choosing the most appropriate phrasing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

permit on

This alternative offers a more formal and grammatically sound way to express permission or authorization.

enable on

This suggests activating or making something functional on a particular platform or system.

permit access to

This alternative clearly indicates granting entry or usage rights.

authorize on

This implies official approval or sanction for something to be done on a specific system.

approve on

This option suggests giving formal consent or endorsement for something on a platform.

give access on

This conveys the action of granting entry or the ability to use something on a particular system.

sanction on

This alternative implies giving official permission or approval, often in a more formal context.

okay on

This is a more informal way to express approval or permission for something.

countenance on

This alternative means to give approval or support to, suggesting a more formal and perhaps reluctant acceptance.

accede to on

This suggests agreeing or consenting to something, often after some initial reluctance or negotiation.

FAQs

Is "allow on" grammatically correct?

According to Ludwig AI, the phrase "allow on" is generally considered grammatically incorrect and can be unclear. It's better to use more precise alternatives.

What are some alternatives to "allow on"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "permit on", "enable on", "permit access to", or "authorize on".

How can I make my writing more precise when I'm tempted to use "allow on"?

Consider the specific meaning you want to convey. If you mean to grant permission, use "permit". If you mean to activate a feature, use "enable". If you mean to give official approval, use "authorize".

In what contexts is "allow on" most likely to appear?

While "allow on" appears in various contexts like news and media, science, and wiki content, it's often used informally. For formal or professional writing, it's advisable to choose a more grammatically sound alternative.