allocate with

USAGE SUMMARY

'allocate with' is not a correct sentence in written English.
You would not use it in this form. A more appropriate form of the sentence might be 'allocate to': The budget was allocated to various departments.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

(State-owned banks control three- quarters of Egypt's liquid capital, which they allocate with ruinous ineptitude).Luckily, Egypt's economy has already started to recover, despite the mess elsewhere in the region.

The Economist

The BI-based bandwidth allocation mechanism (BAM) is mainly responsible for deciding which traffic demand should be chosen to allocate with its required bandwidth.

Journal of Cloud Computing

Pataki also oversaw the New York Liberty Development Corporation, the entity created to allocate, with New York City, $8 billion in post-9/11 "Liberty Bonds".

Huffington Post

Pataki also oversaw the New York Liberty Development Corporation, the entity created to allocate, with New York City, $8 billion in post-9/11 "Liberty Bonds". Its biggest beneficiary: Goldman Sachs, which received $1.65 billion in Liberty Bonds as well as HUD Community Development Block Grant funds and additional city and state tax credits for its new headquarters in Lower Manhattan.

HuffPost

While this concentration could have been warranted during the capacity building stage, the third wave of health reforms has given state governments increased funds to allocate with a high degree of autonomy.

Health Research Policy and Systems

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

In this algorithm, only a subset of the tones is dynamically allocated with crosstalk canceller taps, while the other tones have a static allocation.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

In the capitalist world, scarce goods and services are allocated with prices.

The New York Times

The trouble is, foreign aid has rarely been allocated with these points in mind.

The Economist

Now teams will be allocated with a dollar value based on their record to sign international players with the worst teams being allocated the most money to spend.

The Guardian - Sport

Green infrastructure elements were allocated with GUIDOS, whereas the travelling costs to move between them was also considered.

Ecological Indicators

By the time his own agenda crystallised, much of the bonanza of extra state spending had already been allocated, with debatable gains in efficiency.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "allocate to" instead of "allocate with". "Allocate to" correctly indicates where resources are being directed. For example, say "The budget was allocated to different departments" instead of "The budget was allocated with different departments."

Common error

A frequent error is pairing "allocate" with the preposition "with". This is grammatically incorrect. Ensure you use "to" to clearly define the recipient of the allocation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "allocate with" functions incorrectly as a verb phrase aiming to describe the action of assigning or distributing something. Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect, suggesting the proper construction is "allocate to".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

25%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

25%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "allocate with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. As highlighted by Ludwig AI, the correct form is "allocate to". While examples of "allocate with" can be found across various sources, including news and scientific publications, its usage constitutes an error. When writing, it's crucial to replace "allocate with" with "allocate to" or other appropriate alternatives such as "assign", "distribute among", or "provide with" to ensure grammatical accuracy and clarity. Avoiding this error enhances the credibility and professionalism of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

allocate to

Replaces "with" with the correct preposition "to" for indicating the recipient of the allocation.

allot to

Similar to "allocate", but can suggest a more formal or official distribution.

assign to

Focuses on the assignment aspect rather than the allocation, suitable when tasks or responsibilities are being distributed.

designate for

Suggests a specific purpose or recipient for the allocation.

appropriate for

Focuses on allocating resources specifically for a given purpose.

distribute among

Emphasizes the distribution of resources or items across a group.

dedicate to

Similar to "devote to", but can also imply a formal or ceremonial allocation.

earmark for

Implies setting aside resources for a particular use or purpose.

devote to

Emphasizes a strong commitment of resources or time to a specific cause or purpose.

provide with

Highlights the act of supplying something to someone or something.

FAQs

Is it grammatically correct to say "allocate with"?

No, "allocate with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct phrasing is to use "allocate to".

What is the difference between "allocate to" and "allocate with"?

"Allocate with" is not a standard or accepted English construction. "Allocate to" is the correct form, indicating where something is being assigned or distributed.

What can I say instead of "allocate with"?

Use "allocate to" which is the grammatically correct alternative. Other options include "assign", "distribute", or "provide" depending on the specific context.

How do I use "allocate to" in a sentence?

You can use "allocate to" to show where resources, funds, or tasks are being assigned. For example: "The funds were allocated to the marketing department."