all winners

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "all winners" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to a group of individuals or entities that have achieved success or victory in a particular context, such as a competition or contest. Example: "In this tournament, all winners will receive a trophy and a certificate of achievement."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

You're ALL winners!

Huffington Post

All winners.

The New York Times

Desserts were all winners.

The New York Times

We're all winners tonight".

The Guardian - Film

All winners lose.

Harvard Business Review

Jean said, "we're all winners".

The New York Times

Potentially, we are all winners.

The Guardian

We are all winners today".

The Guardian

The entrees, however, were all winners.

The New York Times

At face value, we're all winners here.

The Guardian - Music

If that effort succeeds, we're all winners.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "all winners" when you want to emphasize that every participant or entity involved has achieved a positive outcome, regardless of ranking or specific awards.

Common error

Avoid using "all winners" in highly competitive scenarios where clear distinctions between performers exist. It may diminish the value and recognition of true top performers if used inappropriately.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "all winners" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as a subject complement or appositive. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in various contexts. It identifies or describes a group of individuals or entities who have achieved success.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Academia

18%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Science

2%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "all winners" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote shared success or positive outcomes for all participants. As affirmed by Ludwig AI, it finds its place across diverse contexts, predominantly in news and media, academic, and formal business settings. While its usage is generally neutral, it's crucial to consider the specific context and avoid misapplication in scenarios where distinct performance differences exist. Remember, the impact of "all winners" lies in its ability to promote inclusivity and celebrate collective achievement.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

everybody wins

Focuses on universal success rather than specifying "all" participants.

all are victorious

Emphasizes victory but uses a more formal tone.

each one a winner

Highlights individual success within a group.

success for everyone

Shifts focus from individuals to the overall positive result.

all participants succeed

Replaces the noun "winners" with the verb "succeed", focusing on accomplishment.

everyone triumphs

Uses a stronger verb, "triumphs", to denote significant success.

all achieve victory

More formal and emphasizes the act of achieving victory.

a win-win situation

Describes a scenario where all parties benefit, not necessarily personal victories.

all are successful

Focuses on overall success rather than winning in a competition.

each participant a success

Highlights individual successes.

FAQs

How can I use "all winners" in a sentence?

You can use "all winners" to describe situations where everyone involved achieves a positive outcome, such as "In this collaborative project, we are "all winners" because we all contributed to its success".

What is a good alternative to saying "all winners"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "everyone succeeds", "everybody wins", or "all are victorious" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it appropriate to say "all winners" even when there are varying degrees of success?

Using "all winners" is most fitting when everyone involved derives some benefit or positive outcome, even if some participants achieve more than others. If success is drastically unequal, it may be more accurate to acknowledge the varying levels of achievement.

What's the difference between "all winners" and "a win-win situation"?

"All winners" typically refers to individuals or entities that have achieved a positive result. "A "win-win situation"" describes a scenario where all parties involved benefit from the outcome, focusing on the situation's structure rather than individual results.