all smokers

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "all smokers" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to every individual who smokes, often in discussions about health, policy, or social issues related to smoking. Example: "All smokers should be aware of the health risks associated with tobacco use."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

"All smokers should have a lung function test," Dr. Parkes said.

The New York Times - Health

What Satrapi ignores is that all smokers will eventually stop smoking, one way or another.

The New York Times

The American Lung Association estimates about 90percentt of all smokers start before the age of 21.

The New York Times

All smokers are not bad people, nor are all S.U.V. owners arrogant, nor cellphone users bad parents.

The New York Times

The advertisements are expected to be seen at least once a week by 85 percent of all smokers.

The New York Times

There are those who feel the only way forward is for all smokers to quit forever and completely and this gives them the best chance of quitting.

The Guardian

This is because smoking is so deadly that even though not all smokers succeed in quitting, even with NHS help, the benefits for those that do are massive.

The Guardian

However, not all smokers exhibit the development of airflow limitation.

Respiratory Medicine

All smokers also received the same intensive cognitive behavior therapy.

Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Fraig et al. demonstrated the presence of RB in all smokers and about 50%% of former smokers [41].

Insights into Imaging

All smokers know the worst part of the process is in the first week.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing health risks or policy implications, using the phrase "all smokers" ensures that the information is applicable and understood by everyone who smokes. Be aware of excluding those who use other nicotine products.

Common error

While "all smokers" encompasses a broad group, remember that individual experiences, motivations, and health outcomes can vary significantly. Avoid making blanket statements that do not account for these differences.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "all smokers" functions as a determiner phrase specifying the entire group of individuals who smoke. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. It's commonly used to make generalizations or address the smoking population as a whole.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

42%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "all smokers" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that refers to every individual who smokes. Ludwig AI validates its appropriateness in written English. It's commonly found in both scientific and news media contexts, serving to generalize or address the entire smoking population. While versatile, it's important to avoid overgeneralizations and consider the diverse experiences within this group. Related phrases such as "every smoker" or "people who smoke" can offer nuanced alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

every smoker

Focuses on each individual who smokes, emphasizing individual consideration.

all people who smoke

A more formal and explicit way of saying "all smokers".

smokers in general

Refers to the group of smokers as a whole, without focusing on individual instances.

the smoking population

Emphasizes the collective group from a statistical or demographic perspective.

all cigarette users

Specifies the method of smoking, focusing on cigarette consumption.

those who smoke

A more indirect and descriptive way to refer to smokers.

all tobacco users

Broadens the scope to include users of all forms of tobacco, not just smokers.

every individual who smokes

Highlights the individuality of each smoker, with a slightly more formal tone.

the entirety of smokers

Emphasizes the complete and comprehensive inclusion of all individuals who smoke.

all addicted to nicotine

Focuses on the addiction aspect of smoking, rather than the act itself.

FAQs

Is it accurate to use "all smokers" when referring to people with varying levels of nicotine dependence?

Yes, "all smokers" generally includes everyone who smokes, regardless of their level of dependence. However, when discussing specific treatments or interventions, it may be necessary to differentiate based on nicotine dependence levels.

What's a less accusatory or judgmental way to refer to "all smokers" in sensitive discussions?

Instead of "all smokers", you could use phrases like "people who smoke" or "individuals who smoke" to avoid potential stigma.

How can I use "all smokers" in a sentence about public health policies?

You might say: "Public health policies should aim to provide resources and support for "all smokers" who wish to quit."

Are there situations where it's better to be more specific than using "all smokers"?

Yes. If you're discussing the effects of specific types of tobacco, for example, it's better to use more precise terms such as "all cigarette users" or "all smokeless tobacco users".