all samples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "all samples" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is often used to describe a group or collection of items or data that have been gathered for analysis. Here is an example: "All samples collected from the test subjects were analyzed for traces of the virus."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

J.B. collected all samples.

Nature

All samples were processed individually.

Nature

All samples were drawn simultaneously.

Stanford University

All samples were analyzed in duplicate.

Nature

All samples were stored in −80 °C.

Nature

All samples were blinded for quantification.

Nature

All samples gave signals.

Protein & Cell

for all samples.

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology

All samples were deidentified.

Plosone

All samples were anonymous.

Plosone

All samples tested positive.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing scientific reports, clearly define the population from which "all samples" were drawn to ensure reproducibility and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "all samples" without specifying the context. For instance, instead of saying "all samples tested positive", clarify "all blood samples from patients with condition X tested positive" to avoid misinterpretation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "all samples" functions as a determiner phrase followed by a noun, specifying that every item within a defined collection of samples is being referred to. This aligns with Ludwig's observation that it's grammatically correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

98%

Academia

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "all samples" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed term, particularly within scientific and academic disciplines. As Ludwig AI confirms, its purpose is to denote inclusivity and totality when referring to a specific group of samples. Usage is most common in scientific contexts, emphasizing the comprehensive scope of analyses or procedures. When using this phrase, ensure you clearly define the population from which samples were drawn to prevent ambiguity and maintain clarity in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

all of the samples

A more emphatic version of "all samples", slightly stressing the totality.

every sample

Focuses on each individual sample within the entire group, similar to "all samples" but with a slightly more granular emphasis.

each and every sample

Emphasizes the inclusiveness and individual consideration of each item in the set.

each individual sample

Highlights the independent nature and individual analysis of each sample.

the complete set of samples

Highlights the entirety and comprehensiveness of the sample collection.

the entire collection of samples

Similar to the previous one, this emphasizes the wholeness of the sample group.

the whole sample group

Focuses on the entire group of samples as a unit.

100% of the samples

Quantifies the inclusion, making it explicit that no sample is excluded.

the totality of samples

More formal and emphasizes the aggregate nature of the samples.

samples in their entirety

Highlights that samples are considered as complete entities.

FAQs

How can I use "all samples" in a sentence?

You can use "all samples" to refer to every item in a specific collection or group being studied or analyzed. For instance, "All samples were analyzed for protein content."

What are some alternatives to saying "all samples"?

Depending on the context, alternatives include "every sample", "each sample", or "the entire sample". The best choice depends on whether you want to emphasize individual items or the collection as a whole.

Is it redundant to say "all of the samples" instead of "all samples"?

While "all of the samples" is grammatically correct and adds emphasis, "all samples" is generally more concise and preferred in formal writing. The addition of "of the" doesn't significantly alter the meaning.

In scientific writing, is "all samples" sufficiently specific?

In scientific writing, clarify the source or type of samples. For example, instead of "all samples", specify "all blood samples", "all soil samples", or "all patient samples" to maintain precision.