all relevant stakeholders

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "all relevant stakeholders" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to all parties or individuals who have an interest or stake in a particular issue, project, or decision. Example: "Before making a final decision, we need to consult all relevant stakeholders to gather their input and feedback."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

All relevant stakeholders should be involved in design of public reporting frameworks.

Social Science & Medicine

Through democratic consultation with all relevant stakeholders, Caldicott2 might have provided a timely, non-partisan assessment of the information governance regime.

The Guardian

Sustainability affects multiple links of the supply chain and is considered increasingly important by all relevant stakeholders.

Journal of Cleaner Production

A well-structured cooperative model that involves all relevant stakeholders will raise the living standards of Lahore's informal waste pickers while also increasing LWMC's operational efficiency, Sipra says.

Yale University

The charter, along with implementation tools and design principles, aim to create an environment in which all relevant stakeholders are included and everyone's expertise is valued.

Stanford University

The results indicate that improvements over the current network can be obtained for all relevant stakeholders simultaneously, with savings in the order of $1.2 million daily.

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Setback and zoning strategies need to be enforced through legislation, and all relevant stakeholders should be included in the design, implementation and institutionalisation of these initiatives.

Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science

Co-management of forest resources is a process of governance that enables all relevant stakeholders to participate in the decision-making processes.

Mathematical and Computer Modelling

Major decisions around bioprocess automation strategy should involve all relevant stakeholders; communication between technical and business strategy decision-makers is of particular importance.

Cytotherapy

This paper proposes a framework for a holistic risk assessment of airport surface operations that integrates the actions of all relevant stakeholders.

Safety Science

In a recent study, we involved all relevant stakeholders to identify practice-based implementation components for successful implementation and sustainability in work environment interventions.

Applied Ergonomics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "all relevant stakeholders", clearly define who these stakeholders are to avoid ambiguity. For instance, specify whether you are referring to internal teams, external partners, or community members.

Common error

Avoid assuming everyone is a stakeholder. Be specific about who is directly impacted or involved in the matter at hand. Broad generalizations dilute the focus and effectiveness of your communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "all relevant stakeholders" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It identifies a group of individuals or entities with a vested interest in a particular matter. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

53%

News & Media

25%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

10%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "all relevant stakeholders" is a commonly used and grammatically correct term for emphasizing the importance of inclusivity in decision-making. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is used across various domains, including science, news, business, and academia. The phrase functions as a noun phrase, referring to individuals or entities with a vested interest in a particular matter. When using "all relevant stakeholders", it's crucial to clearly define who these stakeholders are to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives like "all concerned parties" or "all interested parties" for slight variations in emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the relevant stakeholders

More concise, but implies a pre-defined set of stakeholders.

every stakeholder involved

Similar meaning, but rephrased for emphasis.

each relevant stakeholder

Focuses on each individual stakeholder rather than the group as a whole.

all stakeholders concerned

Similar to "all concerned parties" but includes the term 'stakeholders'.

all concerned parties

Focuses on those who have concerns related to the matter.

all interested parties

Highlights those who have an interest in the outcome.

all key participants

Emphasizes the active roles of individuals involved.

all pertinent individuals

Stresses the importance and relevance of the individuals.

all involved entities

Focuses on organizations and groups, not just individuals.

all affected groups

Highlights those who are impacted by the situation.

FAQs

How do you use "all relevant stakeholders" in a sentence?

You can use "all relevant stakeholders" to emphasize the inclusion of every involved party. For example, "The success of this project hinges on the collaboration of "all relevant stakeholders"." Always specify the project or decision.

What can I say instead of "all relevant stakeholders"?

You can use alternatives like "all concerned parties", "all interested parties", or "all key participants" depending on the context.

Is it redundant to say "all relevant stakeholders involved"?

Yes, "involved" is generally redundant because "stakeholders" inherently implies involvement. Saying ""all relevant stakeholders"" is sufficient.

How do I identify "all relevant stakeholders" in a project?

Start by mapping out everyone who is directly or indirectly affected by the project's outcomes. Consider including customers, employees, partners, community members, and even competitors depending on the project's scope.