all relevant evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "all relevant evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as legal discussions, research papers, or any situation where the importance of considering all pertinent information is emphasized. Example: "In order to make a fair judgment, the court must consider all relevant evidence presented during the trial."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

42 human-written examples

"Cases will be evaluated on an individual basis, considering all relevant evidence," Ms. Hawkins said.

The New York Times

"When called for jury service, you assume with good faith that all relevant evidence will be presented.

The Guardian

Several members of the plaintiffs' bar opposed that recommendation, saying that the regimen of months under limited discovery pressured plaintiffs to settle cases without seeing all relevant evidence.

The New York Times

In a statement, Ofcom said: "We will consider all relevant evidence as part of our ongoing duty to be satisfied that persons are fit and proper.

Independent

"I also remind the trust how vital it is to publish all relevant evidence, as soon as possible, in order to rebuild public trust and confidence in the BBC," Miller added.

The Guardian

When the Yemenis were asked about the restrictions, the sources said, they were told that the limits were in accordance with Yemeni practice, and that all relevant evidence was being passed on.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

18 human-written examples

A systematic literature study is a systematic and repeatable approach to identify and study all relevant evidences, i.e. primary studies, on a specific research question or phenomenon[10].

EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems

He intended to prove the existence of a conspiracy led by Paine, but Goss ruled all the relevant evidence inadmissible.

The New Yorker

He further alleges that The Sun has failed to provide "all the relevant evidence in its possession to the police".

The Guardian

Under the procedures a defendant or claimant will not, however, be permitted to see all the relevant evidence.

The Guardian

Zola was thereupon convicted of libel in a trial whose judge ruled nearly all the relevant evidence inadmissible and was forced to go into exile in England.

The New York Times - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting "all relevant evidence", ensure each piece is clearly connected to the argument or case you're building. Avoid overwhelming your audience with data; prioritize clarity and conciseness.

Common error

Don't just present "all relevant evidence" without explaining its significance. Always provide context and analysis to show how the evidence supports your claims or conclusions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "all relevant evidence" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the object of a verb or the subject of a clause. It identifies the complete set of evidence that is pertinent to a specific situation. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

45%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "all relevant evidence" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression that highlights the importance of considering all pertinent information in a given context. Ludwig AI confirms this. Predominantly found in news and media, as well as scientific sources, it serves to ensure impartiality and thoroughness in evaluations. While alternatives like "every pertinent detail" or "all pertinent facts" exist, the core meaning remains consistent: a complete and unbiased review of the available evidence. When using the phrase, prioritize clear connections to the argument and avoid overwhelming the audience. Its frequent occurrence confirms its usefulness and reliability in formal, neutral, and scientific communications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

every pertinent detail

Focuses on the importance of each individual detail that is pertinent to the situation, rather than the whole body of evidence.

all pertinent facts

Replaces "evidence" with "facts", emphasizing factual information.

every applicable proof

Substitutes "relevant" with "applicable" and "evidence" with "proof", highlighting the proof aspect.

the complete body of proof

Emphasizes the completeness of the evidence as a whole.

every piece of applicable data

Replaces "evidence" with "data", focusing on data as evidence.

the totality of admissible proof

Highlights the legal aspect of the evidence, emphasizing admissibility.

every scrap of consequential information

Uses "consequential information" to express the importance and relevance.

the whole collection of probative things

Rephrases evidence as a whole collection of probative things.

each significant fact

Focuses on importance of each significant fact.

full spectrum of verification

Uses a different term verification for evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "all relevant evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "all relevant evidence" to emphasize the importance of considering all pertinent information. For example, "The committee must consider "all relevant evidence" before making a decision."

What's a good alternative to "all relevant evidence"?

Alternatives include "every pertinent detail", "all pertinent facts", or "every applicable proof", depending on the specific context.

What does it mean to consider "all relevant evidence"?

Considering "all relevant evidence" means taking into account every piece of information that could impact the decision-making process, ensuring nothing important is overlooked.

Is it better to present "all relevant evidence" or just the strongest evidence?

Presenting "all relevant evidence" provides a comprehensive view, but it's crucial to prioritize and highlight the strongest evidence to avoid overwhelming the audience. Omitting crucial pieces can lead to biased conclusions.