all quality

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "all quality" is not correct and lacks clarity in written English.
It may be intended to refer to something that encompasses all aspects of quality, but it is vague and needs more context to be usable. Example: "The product is designed to meet all quality standards set by the industry."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

But not all quality can be measured.

The New Yorker

All quality businesses have multiple revenue streams.

The Guardian

But it's all quality gold, right?

The Guardian - Sport

Tendulkar, Kallis, Symonds, Kumble, Kartik... all quality players.

The Guardian - Sport

We have a big squad and all quality players that can come in.

The Guardian - Sport

"My potential customers all believe that all quality goods come from the West," he said.

The New York Times

Henry Schimberg, chief executive of Coca-Cola Europerisaidin Europe, sall all quality problems had been resolved.

The Guardian - Business

But if you start the other way round, defining journalism that lacks all quality, then the mists begin to clear.

The Guardian

Consistently, noise tops all "quality of life" complaints registered with the police and the city's Department of Environmental Protection.

The New York Times

But they're all quality.

TechCrunch

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

It does convey the freewheeling, catch-all quality of the enterprise.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

For clarity, replace "all quality" with more specific terms like "total quality", "overall quality", or "comprehensive quality" depending on the intended meaning.

Common error

Avoid using "all quality" without specifying the aspect of quality you are referring to. Be specific; for example, say "all aspects of product quality" instead of simply "all quality".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "all quality" functions as a modifier followed by a noun, but it is considered grammatically incorrect by Ludwig AI. It attempts to describe the totality of quality but lacks specific grammatical structure to do so effectively.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

43%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "all quality" appears in various contexts, notably in science and news media. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect and lacking clarity. While it attempts to convey a comprehensive view of quality, it is better replaced with more specific and grammatically sound alternatives like "total quality", "overall quality", or "every aspect of quality". Using these alternatives enhances clarity and ensures grammatical correctness, aligning with best practices for effective communication. Avoid using "all quality" without clear context to prevent vagueness and potential misinterpretation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

total quality

Focuses on the comprehensive nature of quality across all aspects.

overall quality

Emphasizes a general assessment of quality.

complete quality

Highlights the exhaustive or full extent of quality.

entire quality

Stresses the wholeness or totality of quality.

comprehensive quality

Indicates a thorough and inclusive approach to quality.

full quality

Emphasizes the unimpaired or maximum level of quality.

absolute quality

Implies a standard of quality that is perfect or without exception.

every aspect of quality

Breaks down “all quality” and specifies every aspect.

every facet of quality

Changes aspect to facet.

every quality measure

Alternative with measure instead of aspect or facet.

FAQs

What does "all quality" mean?

The phrase "all quality" is vague and generally considered grammatically incorrect. It often intends to refer to every aspect or standard of quality but requires further context to be clear. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment.

How can I use "all quality" in a sentence correctly?

It's better to avoid "all quality" and use alternatives. Instead of saying "all quality", specify what aspects of quality you are referring to. For instance, use "all aspects of quality" or "every quality measure".

What are some alternatives to "all quality"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "total quality", "overall quality", or "comprehensive quality".

Is "all quality" grammatically correct?

No, "all quality" is not grammatically correct in standard English. It lacks clarity and precision. Use more descriptive phrases to convey your intended meaning, as confirmed by Ludwig AI.