all it identified

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "all it identified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the specific items or information that have been recognized or determined by a process or system. Example: "In the analysis, all it identified were the key factors contributing to the decline in sales."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

In all, it identified three "serious violations" of the country's data laws, imposing a €300,000 fine on Google per breach.

Independent

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Above all, it identifies those surface cuticular compounds that are truly available to other individuals, through gustatory or olfactory sensory neurons.

Plosone

In all cases, it identified the RVs that produced the highest scores in the SCORE-TEST, while eliminating the costly effect of analyzing markers with no clear association with the trait of interest.

Bioinformatics and Biology Insights

Truecaller found that between January and March this year, 4.1percentt of all calls that it identified as being made for the purpose of getting a taxi where made to Ola or Ola drivers.

TechCrunch

"Effective immediately, we have revised our policy guidance to require that if a company wants any credit for cooperation, any credit at all, it must identify all individuals involved in the wrongdoing, regardless of their position, status or seniority in the company, and provide all relevant facts about their misconduct,'' deputy attorney general Sally Yates said last month.

The Guardian - Business

One subtyping protocol that detected the virulence-related genes, eae and ehxA, and all stx except for the stx2f gene, was modified by newly designed primers so that it identified all stx genes.

Research in Microbiology

It identified all fractures; however, it also identified 16 patients without a fracture incorrectly.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

It identified all existing security problems in VANETs and classifies them from a cryptographic point of view.

Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences

It does not claim to be a full systematic review, nor has it identified all possible alternatives.

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy

It identified all related activities, the range of implementing and supporting partners, the timeframes for action and a budget breakdown by partner.

Unicef

In all positive control reactions it identified Babesia spp. correctly and failed to give amplicons with the negative control organisms that were closely related to Babesia (Fig.  1).

BMC Veterinary Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "all it identified", ensure the context clearly defines the subject doing the identifying and the scope of what could have been identified versus what was actually found. This enhances clarity and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid assuming that "all it identified" represents a complete or exhaustive finding. Always consider whether the method used could have missed other relevant information.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "all it identified" acts as a determiner phrase. It specifies the entirety of the elements or information that a particular process or entity has recognized. Ludwig examples illustrate its usage in contexts ranging from data analysis to security problem detection, highlighting its role in defining the scope of findings.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

32%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "all it identified" is a versatile phrase used to specify the complete set of items recognized by a process or system. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. While common across various contexts like science, news, and business, it's essential to ensure the scope of identification is clear and that the phrase accurately reflects the completeness of the findings. Alternatives like "everything it recognized" or "all it detected" can offer similar meanings with slightly different nuances. Remember to use this phrase judiciously to avoid misinterpretations regarding the comprehensiveness of the identification process.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

everything it recognized

Focuses on the totality of recognition, emphasizing the extent of what was identified.

all it detected

Highlights the act of discovering something, often through a specific method or tool.

all it determined

Emphasizes a conclusive finding or decision reached after consideration.

the extent of its findings

Shifts the focus to the scope and range of the discoveries made.

the entirety of its recognition

Stresses the completeness of the identification process.

the comprehensive list of its detections

Specifies that a full list has been created of every detection.

a complete account of what it found

Similar to "all it identified" in that it describes finding something and giving an account of it.

its complete discovery

Highlights a conclusive finding or decision reached after consideration.

the inventory of what was recognized

Focuses on the creation of an itemized list of identified elements

a detailed breakdown of what it picked up

Focuses on a comprehensive analysis and breakdown of what was detected or identified.

FAQs

How can I use "all it identified" in a sentence?

Use "all it identified" to specify the complete set of items or information recognized by a particular process or system. For example: "After the audit, "all it identified" were minor discrepancies".

What are some alternatives to "all it identified"?

You can use alternatives such as "everything it recognized", "all it detected", or "all it determined" depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "all it identified" and "what it identified"?

"All it identified" emphasizes the completeness of the findings, while "what it identified" simply refers to the items recognized without necessarily implying that the list is exhaustive. Using ""all it identified"" suggests that everything that could be found, was found.

In what contexts is "all it identified" most appropriate?

The phrase ""all it identified"" is suitable in contexts where you want to highlight the comprehensive nature of the identified items, such as in scientific reports, business analyses, or investigative journalism.