all associates

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "all associates" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to every member of a group or organization, typically in a professional context. Example: "The meeting will be open to all associates, so please make sure to attend."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

12 human-written examples

Have David Cameron or Nick Clegg rounded up all associates of these young men?

The Guardian - Opinion

"That's the kind of things that all associates should want to disassociate themselves from," Mr. Rangel said.

The New York Times

KIMMEL--Martin S. The Board of Directors, Officers and all Associates of Kimco Realty mourn the loss of Martin S. Kimmel, our Chairman Emeritus and co-founder.

The New York Times

Walmart will introduce fixed schedules for some workers by 2016 and all associates will be given at least two and a half weeks notice of their hours.

The Guardian - Business

More proof: According to the American Bar Association, women in 2008 made up almost half of all associates, but only 18.3percentt of partners.

The New York Times

Mr. Bharara added that agents and detectives from the Joint Terrorism Task Force "are still getting all the information we can in regard to any and all associates he may have".

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

48 human-written examples

A full 20 matches are being broadcast, a record for an all-associate tournament.

The Guardian - Sport

And closest of all have been the two all-associate match-ups.

Independent

"They all associate themselves with the country.

The New York Times

It also offers open access to all associated data relating to what content is consumed.

The Guardian - Film

These are almost all associated with Hollywood names, remakes or revivals including acclaimed US comedy Arrested Development.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "all associates", ensure the context clearly defines who the associates are. Specify the organization or group they belong to for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "all associates" when you mean a specific subset. If only a certain department is involved, specify "all associates in marketing" instead of the broader term.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "all associates" functions as a determiner phrase, specifying the entirety of a group of individuals who are associated with an organization or entity. Ludwig confirms its usability in referring to every member of a group, particularly in professional settings.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "all associates" is a grammatically correct and usable term, commonly found in professional contexts to refer to every member of a group or organization. Ludwig identifies that the phrase is suitable for indicating inclusivity in a workplace setting. While its frequency is uncommon, it appears in reputable sources like The New York Times and The Guardian. For more specific situations, consider using alternatives such as "every colleague" or "every member" to enhance clarity and precision. Ensure that the context clearly defines who the associates are to avoid overgeneralization.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

each member

Uses "member" instead of "associate", suitable for organizations or groups. Broader than just professional settings.

all staff

Emphasizes the employment aspect, suitable for company-wide communications. A more formal alternative.

every colleague

Replaces "associates" with "colleague", focusing on a work relationship. This changes the scope to only those you directly work with.

all employees

Directly refers to employees, suitable for HR-related contexts. More formal and specific.

all personnel

A more formal term for staff or employees, often used in official documents. Higher register.

the entire team

Specifically refers to a team, implying a collaborative unit. More specific than "all associates".

every partner

If the context involves a partnership, this specifies all partners involved. Narrower scope.

each affiliate

Refers to affiliated members or organizations, useful in networked contexts. Different emphasis.

the whole group

A more general term that can apply to any collection of people. Less formal.

every person involved

Highlights involvement, focusing on those actively participating. Different emphasis.

FAQs

How can I use "all associates" in a sentence?

You can use "all associates" to refer to every member of a group or organization, typically in a professional context. For example, "The training session is mandatory for "every staff member" including "every employee" and "every partner"."

What can I say instead of "all associates"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "every colleague", "every member", or "the entire team".

Is it better to say "all associates" or "all employees"?

The best choice depends on the specific context. "All employees" is more specific to employer-employee relationships, while "all associates" can encompass a broader range of affiliations, including partners or members.

When should I avoid using "all associates"?

Avoid using "all associates" if the context requires a more specific term, such as "every staff", "every member", or ""every partner"". Using a more precise term ensures clarity and avoids overgeneralization.