agreements struck

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "agreements struck" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to agreements that have been made or finalized, often in a formal or legal context. Example: "After lengthy negotiations, several agreements struck between the two parties were documented."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

34 human-written examples

But agreements struck with three parties mean National can govern in comfort.

The Economist

The lawyers declined to give details of the agreements struck with US officials.

The Guardian

The international agreements struck so far have failed miserably in halting the world's biodiversity crisis.

The Guardian

Most of them flew direct from the mainland under new agreements struck in Mr Ma's first year in office.

The Economist

Under a guillotine clause, such a breach would annul six other economic agreements struck at the time.

The Economist

Under agreements struck with Ford and General Motors, most of the companies' factory workers will get profit-sharing cheques instead of annual rises.

The Guardian - Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

26 human-written examples

A similar agreement struck in October last year fell through.

The Economist

The final compromise agreement, struck by Burke, said 2,750.

The Guardian

He believed that was the agreement struck in 2011.

The Washington Post

A recent agreement struck by the new president will provide welcome support from NATO troops.

The Economist

A no-poaching agreement struck among local outsourcing firms soon fell apart.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "agreements struck" when you want to emphasize the action of reaching an agreement, often after a period of negotiation or discussion. It is particularly suitable for formal contexts such as news reports or business communications.

Common error

Avoid using "agreements struck" in casual conversations or informal writing. Opt for simpler alternatives like "deals made" or "arrangements reached" to maintain a natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "agreements struck" typically functions as a noun phrase modified by a past participle, describing agreements that have been successfully concluded or finalized. It emphasizes the completion of a negotiation process. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's validity in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

63%

Formal & Business

21%

Science

16%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "agreements struck" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote the completion of formal agreements, as affirmed by Ludwig. Predominantly found in news, business, and formal contexts, it conveys the culmination of negotiations and settlements. When writing, it's best used in situations that require a precise and formal tone, such as official reports or announcements. Consider simpler alternatives in informal settings to maintain a natural flow. In conclusion, "agreements struck" effectively communicates that deals have been finalized, and is particularly useful in professional communications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

deals reached

Emphasizes the accomplishment of reaching a mutual understanding, often in a business context. Less formal than "agreements struck".

settlements made

Highlights the resolution of disputes or conflicts, carrying a legal or formal tone.

understandings achieved

Focuses on the mutual comprehension and accord established between parties, implying a degree of intellectual alignment.

pacts concluded

Conveys a sense of formality and finality, suitable for describing treaties or significant arrangements.

arrangements finalized

Highlights the completion and implementation of specific plans or accommodations.

contracts signed

Refers specifically to legally binding documents, emphasizing the commitment and obligations involved.

compromises reached

Focuses on mutual concessions made to achieve a resolution, highlighting the cooperative aspect.

accords established

Emphasizes the creation of harmonious relationships or formal agreements, often on a larger scale.

resolutions adopted

Highlights the formal acceptance of decisions or policies, often within organizational or governmental frameworks.

bargains made

Focuses on negotiations and exchanges, implying a mutual benefit or trade-off.

FAQs

How can I use "agreements struck" in a sentence?

You can use "agreements struck" to describe situations where agreements have been reached, such as "Under the "agreements struck", both companies will collaborate on the project" or "The government announced several "agreements struck" with local businesses".

What are some alternatives to "agreements struck"?

Alternatives include "deals reached", "settlements made", or "arrangements finalized", depending on the specific context and level of formality desired.

Is there a difference between "agreements struck" and "agreements reached"?

While both phrases convey a similar meaning, "agreements struck" emphasizes the act of striking or finalizing the agreement, often implying a more formal or negotiated process. "Agreements reached" simply highlights the outcome of having come to an agreement.

In which contexts is it most appropriate to use "agreements struck"?

"Agreements struck" is most appropriate in formal contexts such as legal documents, news reports, and business communications where a clear and precise description of the agreement's completion is needed. Avoid using it in casual conversation.