agent with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "agent with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are describing a person or entity that acts on behalf of another, often in a professional or legal capacity. Example: "The agent with the authority to negotiate the contract will be present at the meeting."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Nor an agent with claws.

The Guardian - Film

Karen Kuchins, an agent with Evers & Co.

The Washington Post

Neither will be bothering his agent with a phone call.

The Guardian - Sport

"But we include a professional bonding agent with our kits".

The New York Times

(Disclosure: I share a book agent with Ms. Rotolo).

The New York Times - Arts

Her mother is an agent with Northbrook Travel.

The New York Times - Style

Lisa Villar, an agent with ReMax in Port St . Lucie

The New York Times

Who was that DEA agent with the mega-walrus moustache?

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Her mother is an agent with Sterling Travel in Atlanta.

The New York Times - Style

You are an F.B.I. agent with virtual-reality sunglasses.

The New Yorker

His mother is a real estate agent with Coldwell Banker.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "agent with", ensure the context clearly defines the type of relationship involved. For example, specify 'real estate agent with Coldwell Banker' for clarity.

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by clearly stating the agent's role or affiliation. Instead of just saying "agent with", specify "travel agent with Sterling Travel" or "FBI agent with virtual-reality sunglasses".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "agent with" functions as a descriptor, often adjectival, specifying an affiliation or association. As Ludwig AI suggests, it clarifies the role or connection of an agent to a particular entity. For example, "real estate agent with Coldwell Banker" identifies the agent's company.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

25%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "agent with" is a commonly used descriptor that indicates an affiliation or association, often in a professional context. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and readily understood. Its frequency and usage across various sources, particularly News & Media, Science, and Academia, show its broad applicability. When using "agent with", ensuring clarity about the type of agent and the nature of the relationship is key. Alternatives such as "representative for" or "affiliated with" can be considered depending on the specific context. The phrase is versatile and useful for providing context about an agent's role or connection.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

representative for

Focuses on the act of representing someone or something.

affiliated with

Emphasizes a formal connection or association.

associated with

Highlights a general connection or relationship.

in partnership with

Indicates a collaborative relationship or joint venture.

working with

Focuses on the act of collaborating or cooperating.

connected to

Highlights a link or attachment between entities.

member of

Emphasizes belonging to a group or organization.

employee of

Specifies an employment relationship.

signed with

Indicates a contractual agreement, often in sports or entertainment.

contracted with

Specifies a formal agreement or contract.

FAQs

How can I use "agent with" in a sentence?

Use "agent with" to describe someone or something that is acting on behalf of someone or is affiliated with something. For example, "She is a real estate "agent with" Coldwell Banker."

What are some alternatives to "agent with"?

You can use alternatives like "representative for", "affiliated with", or "associated with" depending on the context of your sentence.

Which is correct: "agent with" or "agent of"?

Both "agent with" and "agent of" are grammatically correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "Agent with" implies an affiliation, while "agent of" suggests direct representation. Choose the one that best fits the intended meaning.

Is there a difference between using "agent with" and simply stating the affiliation?

Using "agent with" is often more concise when the affiliation is the primary focus. However, simply stating the affiliation (e.g., "She works at Sterling Travel") is also correct and can sometimes provide more clarity depending on sentence structure.