after a clash

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "after a clash" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe events or actions that occur following a conflict or confrontation. Example: "The negotiations resumed after a clash between the two parties over the terms of the agreement."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Sport

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

After a clash with his abductors, they found his body.

The New York Times

42 min: After a clash of heads at Celtic Park, Loovens looks well jiggered.

The Guardian - Sport

Police are confronting protesters, after a clash earlier today with military police.

The Guardian

Kieran Gibbs was substituted after a clash of heads with Weimann.

The Guardian - Sport

The project, named after a Clash song, was set up in memory of Joe Strummer.

The Guardian - Music

2005 Has two metal plates inserted in fractured cheekbone after a clash with Wigan's Terry Newton.

The Guardian - Sport

The two journalists were captured by Ethiopian troops after a clash with the group of terrorists escorting them.

The New York Times

An aerial challenge finds the Dutchman with a cut head after a clash of heads with Badstuber.

The New York Times

Ferguson turned his fiery rage upon Moyes after a clash between players yards in front of them.

The New York Times - Sports

Brighton's box came under increasing pressure, but Cardiff lost their captain, Sean Morrison, after a clash of heads.

The Guardian - Sport

After a clash of shoulders in the final kilometre, Cavendish was lying only eighth in the string.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "after a clash" to clearly indicate a sequence of events where a conflict precedes a specific outcome or action. This makes the relationship between the conflict and its consequences immediately apparent to the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "after a clash" in sentences where it's unclear who or what was involved in the clash. Ensure the subject is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "after a clash" functions as a prepositional phrase, modifying a verb or noun by indicating the temporal relationship between an event and a preceding confrontation. As Ludwig AI shows, it is typically used to set the scene or provide context for events that unfold following a conflict.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Sport

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Science

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "after a clash" is a prepositional phrase used to indicate that an event occurred following a conflict. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct and very common, primarily appearing in news and sports contexts. While generally neutral in tone, it is appropriate for formal and informal writing. Alternatives like "following an altercation" or "subsequent to a confrontation" may be considered for more formal writing. When using this phrase, ensure that the subject involved in the clash is clear to avoid ambiguity. The phrase is deemed appropriate and usable in English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

after the dispute

Replaces clash with dispute.

following an altercation

Replaces "clash" with a synonym that suggests a verbal or physical dispute.

following the encounter

Offers a more neutral alternative, suitable for less intense conflicts or meetings.

subsequent to a confrontation

Uses more formal synonyms for both "after" and "clash", increasing the formality.

in the wake of a skirmish

Employs "in the wake of" to mean after and "skirmish" to imply a brief conflict.

once the conflict subsided

This phrase emphasizes the resolution of the conflict as a condition for the subsequent event.

post-conflict

Uses a prefix to indicate a period following a conflict, making it more concise.

with the cessation of conflict

This is a more formal way of saying after the conflict ended.

in the aftermath of a battle

Substitutes "clash" with "battle" to suggest a more significant conflict.

following hostilities

Replaces "clash" with a more formal term, "hostilities", indicating open warfare.

FAQs

How can I use "after a clash" in a sentence?

Use "after a clash" to describe events that occur subsequent to a conflict or confrontation. For example, "The negotiations resumed "after a clash" between the two parties".

What are some alternatives to "after a clash"?

Alternatives include phrases like "following an altercation", "subsequent to a confrontation", or "in the wake of a skirmish", depending on the desired level of formality and the intensity of the conflict.

Is it correct to use "after a clash" in formal writing?

Yes, "after a clash" is generally acceptable in formal writing, particularly in news reporting or analytical contexts. However, for highly formal or academic writing, consider more precise or nuanced alternatives like "subsequent to a confrontation".

What's the difference between "after a clash" and "after a conflict"?

While both phrases indicate a sequence of events following a disagreement, "after a clash" often implies a more direct and potentially violent confrontation. "After a conflict" is a broader term that can encompass disagreements that aren't necessarily physical. A dispute is a "after a conflict" but not always "after a clash".