Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
affirm wrongdoing
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "affirm wrongdoing" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the acknowledgment or confirmation of a mistake or unethical behavior. Example: "The report aims to affirm wrongdoing within the organization and hold those responsible accountable."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Nor is he wrong to call for us to refuse to affirm wrongdoing with our votes.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
"It will affirm it".
News & Media
"Affirm the relationship".
News & Media
Methodist churches affirm infant baptism.
Encyclopedias
Neither bank admitted wrongdoing.
News & Media
She denied any wrongdoing.
News & Media
All have denied wrongdoing.
News & Media
All three deny wrongdoing.
News & Media
Citigroup denies any wrongdoing.
News & Media
All deny wrongdoing.
News & Media
Jankovic denied any wrongdoing.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When writing about legal or ethical matters, ensure you use "affirm wrongdoing" with precision. Avoid using it loosely when a more neutral term like "acknowledge" or "recognize" is more appropriate to accurately reflect the situation.
Common error
Don't confuse passively allowing something to continue with actively "affirming wrongdoing". "Affirming" implies a degree of endorsement or active support, not simply a failure to intervene.
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "affirm wrongdoing" functions as a verb phrase where "affirm" acts as a transitive verb taking "wrongdoing" as its direct object. This construction, as highlighted by Ludwig, indicates an active endorsement or validation of unethical behavior. The use of this phrase goes beyond mere acknowledgment; it suggests acceptance or even justification.
Frequent in
News & Media
100%
Less common in
Science
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "affirm wrongdoing" is a grammatically correct and usable English expression, albeit relatively rare in occurrence. Ludwig AI validates its appropriate use in contexts where active endorsement or validation of unethical or illegal actions is being discussed. As seen in the example from The Economist, the phrase often appears in news and media when describing situations involving ethical breaches or legal disputes. Alternatives such as "endorse misconduct" and "validate unethical behavior" offer similar, yet nuanced, ways to convey the concept. Writers should use caution to ensure the phrase accurately reflects the intended meaning, distinguishing between passive acceptance and active endorsement.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
endorse misconduct
Replaces "affirm" with "endorse" to suggest a more active approval of the wrongdoing.
validate unethical behavior
Substitutes "wrongdoing" with "unethical behavior" and "affirm" with "validate", focusing on the moral aspect of the actions.
ratify improper conduct
Uses "ratify" instead of "affirm", implying a more formal or official acceptance of the improper conduct.
support illicit actions
Replaces "wrongdoing" with "illicit actions", which highlights the illegal nature of the behavior and uses support to show the agreement.
sanction illegal practices
Emphasizes the formal approval of illegal practices, using "sanction" to denote an authoritative endorsement.
justify immoral deeds
Focuses on providing a rationale for deeds considered immoral, shifting the emphasis from affirmation to explanation.
condone misbehavior
Suggests overlooking or accepting misbehavior without punishment, differing from actively affirming.
overlook transgressions
Implies ignoring or failing to address transgressions, a more passive stance than affirming.
excuse faults
Focuses on finding reasons to forgive or minimize faults, rather than affirming the wrongdoing itself.
turn a blind eye to offenses
Highlights the deliberate act of ignoring offenses, indicating a conscious decision not to acknowledge the wrongdoing.
FAQs
How to use "affirm wrongdoing" in a sentence?
Use "affirm wrongdoing" when you want to express active acceptance or validation of unethical or illegal actions. For example: "The report suggests that by not addressing the issue, the company indirectly "affirmed wrongdoing"."
What can I say instead of "affirm wrongdoing"?
You can use alternatives like "endorse misconduct", "validate unethical behavior", or "ratify improper conduct" depending on the context and the level of formality you need.
Which is correct, "affirm wrongdoing" or "acknowledge wrongdoing"?
"Acknowledge wrongdoing" implies recognizing that something wrong has occurred. "Affirm wrongdoing" suggests a stronger stance, implying acceptance or even approval of the wrong action. The choice depends on the specific meaning you intend to convey.
What's the difference between "affirm wrongdoing" and "condone wrongdoing"?
"Condoning wrongdoing" implies overlooking or excusing a wrong action, whereas "affirming wrongdoing" suggests a more active endorsement or justification. To "condone" is to tolerate, while to "affirm" is to actively support.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
88%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested