adverse consequences for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "adverse consequences for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing negative effects or outcomes resulting from a particular action or situation. Example: "The new policy may lead to adverse consequences for employees, affecting their job security and morale."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"This proposal has adverse consequences for the consumer," he said.

The New York Times

That, in turn, may have adverse consequences for equity in learning opportunities and outcomes.

The Guardian - Opinion

This has adverse consequences for the health and wellbeing of LGBTI people".

The Guardian

This may well have adverse consequences for children when they grow up -- and it undeniably hurts them now.

The New York Times

Some have justified not being open because of fear of adverse consequences for them or their employer, such as litigation.

The Guardian

The worries expressed by opponents that it might have adverse consequences for medical care and society have not been realised.

The Guardian - Opinion

They fear that an overreliance on the military will have adverse consequences for privacy and civil liberties.

The New Yorker

Yet this had no obvious adverse consequences for growth or our ability to borrow.

The New York Times

That it is, and the issue now is whether Trump will finally suffer some adverse consequences for breaking the rules of his adopted sport.

The New Yorker

The NTA cannot advise drug treatment services to follow a course of action which is illegal and could have adverse consequences for provider services".

The Guardian

Legislation that limits access to credit may have dramatic, adverse consequences for the vast majority of students who use and manage their credit cards responsibly.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "adverse consequences for", ensure that the subject experiencing the consequences is clearly identified to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

While "adverse consequences for" is a correct and usable phrase, avoid using it excessively in informal writing. Simpler alternatives like "negative effects on" or "harmful impacts on" might be more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "adverse consequences for" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically following a verb or noun phrase to indicate the negative results or outcomes of something on a specific subject or entity. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

37%

News & Media

34%

Formal & Business

29%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "adverse consequences for" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression for describing negative outcomes. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability. Its prevalence in news, science, and formal business contexts indicates a formal to neutral register. When using this phrase, clarity is key: ensure the subject experiencing the consequences is clearly identified. While widely accepted, simpler alternatives may be more suitable for informal writing. Common authoritative sources include The Guardian and The New York Times, highlighting its acceptance in reputable publications.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

negative repercussions for

Replaces "consequences" with "repercussions", emphasizing the indirect or far-reaching effects.

detrimental impacts on

Substitutes "adverse consequences" with "detrimental impacts", which highlights the damaging effect.

harmful effects on

Replaces "adverse consequences" with "harmful effects", which is a more direct and common way to express negative outcomes.

unfavorable outcomes for

Uses "unfavorable outcomes" instead of "adverse consequences", softening the negative connotation slightly.

damaging results for

Emphasizes the destructive nature of the consequences.

ill effects on

A more concise way of expressing negative consequences, especially in medical or health contexts.

drawbacks for

Highlights the disadvantages or problems resulting from a particular action or situation.

downsides for

A more informal way of expressing negative consequences, often used in everyday conversation.

pitfalls for

Suggests hidden dangers or difficulties that may arise as a result.

setbacks for

Focuses on the hindering or delaying effect of the negative consequences.

FAQs

How can I use "adverse consequences for" in a sentence?

You can use "adverse consequences for" to describe the negative outcomes of a situation or action. For example: "The budget cuts could have "adverse consequences for" public services."

What are some alternatives to "adverse consequences for"?

Alternatives include "negative impacts on", "harmful effects on", or "detrimental effects on", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "adverse effects" or "adverse consequences"?

Both "adverse effects" and "adverse consequences" are correct, but "effects" often refers to a direct result, while "consequences" can imply a broader range of outcomes that may not be immediately apparent.

What is the difference between "adverse consequences for" and "adverse ramifications for"?

"Adverse consequences for" generally refers to the direct negative results of an action. "Adverse ramifications for" /s/adverse+ramifications+for implies more far-reaching and complex negative effects.